by tax_schmax on Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:11 pm
It's true what you say, although for this not to look like a sham trust, the trustees should demand some interest. If the trust is not managed with the beneficiaries interests at heart, there is the chance of a potential conflict. As the trustees have discretion over who benefits, you should assume it could be anyone, and that infers that the trust should be managed prudently.
It could be argued that there is no commercial advantage to the trustees undertaking lending without receiving interest, and therefore if HMRC wanted to deem the trust as a sham, they may well have a good case. The Ramsey principle is now entrenched in legislation. This allows a court to look through the steps being taken to see what tax advantage is being achieved and if this is (for want of a better word), fair. It is plain to see that the trustees are earning no interest and the sole objective was to avoid tax. There are more legitimate means to achieve this objective. That is why I said that you should take advice. The Trustee Act compels you to do so and I think you'd be more secure if you took advice. 1% would not be a lot of money in the long term.