by pwjsmith on Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:01 pm
My wife lost her father some years ago and her mother earlier this year. Her mother was intestate, so she and her brother (only children) dealt with the estate. The estate included a house, but the value was less than the threshold for inheritance tax. A grant of representation was given to her and her brother as joint executors. To date the house is still registered to her mother.
Unfortunately her brother passed away a few weeks ago also intestate. He has no dependants (wife/children) and now my wife has to deal with his estate in addition. His estate will be over the inheritance tax threshold due to a second property. So far no application for a grant of representation has been made for his estate while we try to value it.
My question is whether half of his mother's estate (i.e. the house) should be considered in his estate, even though it had not been transferred? Assuming it should would it be possible for my wife to make a deed of variation to her mother's estate to essentially leave it all to her and therefore not be included in part in her brother's estate, ie saving a considerable amount of inheritance tax?
From the reading I have done it appears that all beneficiaries must agree to a variation and it must be enacted by all representatives, but in this case her brother (a beneficiary and representative) has died.
What can my wife do to avoid the inheritance tax on her brother's share of her mother's estate (if indeed it is due)? It seems so unfair that she would have to sell her family home of 50 years in order to pay tax, after loosing her whole family! What would be the typical fee charged by a solicitor to resolve this particular issue?
You views before engaging a solicitor are much appreciated.