by spidersong on Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:14 am
I would say you're wasting your time on this one with any appeal to the VAT office.
I'm assuming that you're not aware that there are two limits involved with VAT, the registration limit, and once you're registered a deregistration limit which is usually £2000 lower. The relevant thresholds at the times you've quoted were:
31/07/04 - £56,000 - You're turnover was £1,517 above the limit.
31/07/05 - £58,000 - £2289 below the limit.
31/07/06 - £59,000 - £883 below the limit.
You could've applied for dereg in 2005 possibly, as it turns out you were above the threshold in 2004 when you actually asked for dereg so you can't really argue that HMRC's decision was unreasonable, since you were above the relevant threshold and legally required to be registered. It would appear to me that any projections you could make from your trading figures would indicate that turnover may be near the dereg threshold but wouldn't conclusively be below it, and so you would've failed to prove you would be below the threshold, only that it could go either way. You may be able to argue the decision was unreasonable if there was a significant and unforseen change in business circumstances that resulted in the extra income and prior to that the income had been almost certain to be below the limit, but this seems unlikely.
So this leaves you with the fact that when asked about dereg HMRC took a reasonable decision that your turnover had been above the limit and would probably remain so and thus refused deregistration. In mid 2005 you may have been in a position to request deregistration but failed to do so, and ditto in 2006, it's not HMRC's fault that you didn't ask them to deregister you, and since there is no legal basis for backdating a voluntary deregistration and no error on HMRC's part my opinion (based on the limited facts available) would be that any appeal on the deregistration date is going to fail.
As to your accountants liability in the matter, that really lies between the two of you. You know what areas of the business you asked the accountant to look at, you know what information you made available to them, you know what the terms of engagement were etc. so it's up to you to decide whether it's worth trying to claim for negligence.
The only area you may have been able to try arguing is that there wasn't a transfer of a going concern and you had no liability to register initially, but goodwill and business assets are enough for something to be a business transfer. Also I'm confused on the dates - You took over the business in 2002, but didn't register till 2004 (from what date did you register?) and then didn't submit any VAT returns till 2006. If HMRC told you that you needed to register in 2002 or 2004 then any appeal against this will start off shakey, if not impossible, as you only have 30 days to appeal against a decision by HMRC and 2002 and/or 2004 are a bit longer ago than that.