by Instinctive on Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:50 am
In a self-employment, the test is less demanding. Any expense has to be wholly and necessarily incurred.
In a lady barrister's case, she was not allowed to claim for court outfits because it also served her to be decent which she would have to have done any way, ie the clothes served a dual purpose.
In your case, I would say that there is no legal necessity for you to have been attending fitness classes or to listening to music CD's or to be wearing specialist shoes. I consider that any benefit you gained personally is only 'incidental' in the process of incurring the expenditure for advancing your business.
I consider that you should be able to claim all these expenses so long as you are not furthering your education so to speak but only keeping abreast of current trends and law.
Ramnik