The distinction here is that these are the codes for those respective bodies to use. Whilst you can use the figures etc yourself to establish your personal tax position, that does not remove the responsibility from your employer (the company being a separate legal person from you) to operate PAYE (either procedures such as P45/P46 or actually making deductions) as appropriate.Hi pjclar02, I have tax codes as issued to previous employer and pension providers for 2010/11. I have P45 and P60s and thus I can accurately calculate my income to ensure I do not exceed LEL.
It might not be so bad then. If the P45 has a "positive" tax code (i.e. ending in L, H, P or V and not prefixed K) and your income from the company is covered by that code ... then had the P45 been handed over (by yourself as an individual to yourself as a director of the company) there would not have been a loss of tax. The only failure (very minor) would have been the failure by the company to send in part 3 of the P45 to HMRC.Hi Mullet, I would confirm I am operating via a limited company. I do have P45 from previous employer. Are you telling me that I should have registered for PAYE and submitted a P14 / P35 by 19 May even if I did not exceed LEL for 2010/11?
I'm probably going back to the old dark days, but way back then there was a requirement for every limited company to have a PAYE scheme, whether or not deductions were being made. HMRC would just keep them dormant until needed, but every director/company had to be recorded and linked. I don't know what happens now.














