Recharging part of cost to sister company

Recharging part of cost to sister company

Postby Kitty Kat on Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:53 am

A pays £1,000 for property insurance for a building. Its sister company B also occupies it, so A charges B 50% of the insurance costs.

Does the 50% magically acquire VAT (this is clearly(?) not a disbursement as they are 'keeping' half the service for themselves) when charged onwards?
"assortment of wardrobe has attained the approval of guys and a large amount of women every little bit as alike"
Kitty Kat
 
Posts: 602
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:18 am

Re: Recharging part of cost to sister company

Postby Kitty Kat on Thu Nov 24, 2011 12:03 pm

Haha, Googled a bit more and found a forum post from another site about this, stating that unless the insurance was for company B and the same cost was recharged, it needs VAT adding (so in my case, VAT needs to be added)

Given the advice was from someone called 'Spidersong' I am inclined to believe it... hehe
"assortment of wardrobe has attained the approval of guys and a large amount of women every little bit as alike"
Kitty Kat
 
Posts: 602
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:18 am

Re: Recharging part of cost to sister company

Postby spidersong on Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:15 pm

What was the context on what I said, as normally the recharge of building insurance costs would be further payment for the underlying supply, so if an exempt rental was charged then the further payment would be exempt, but if a taxable rental then a further taxable payment would be created. So the advice may not port over exactly to your situation.

Regardless of what it is; the underlying advice is that recharges of insurance cannot be disbursement unless the third party has the policy in their name, and the costs go exactly over, so this as you say clearly isn't a disbursement. So the supply made for the consideration is something other than insurance what we need to decide is what that supply is and hence what its liability is.

Company A is likely to have Partial Exemption issues in relation to this recharge, and indeed if they didn't recharge then there'd be either business/non-business issues with their acquisition or leasing of the building, or possibly barter and PE issues if B provided anything to them in return for the right to occupy. Of course it could be that it's joint occupation with no defined areas and so not a right over land and taxable by default anyway.
spidersong
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: Recharging part of cost to sister company

Postby Kitty Kat on Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:48 pm

spidersong wrote:Of course it could be that it's joint occupation with no defined areas and so not a right over land and taxable by default anyway.


This. In fact I was mistold, the insurance was more like business insurance than property insurance, so as far as I can see it will always be recharged including VAT.
"assortment of wardrobe has attained the approval of guys and a large amount of women every little bit as alike"
Kitty Kat
 
Posts: 602
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:18 am

Re: Recharging part of cost to sister company

Postby Generix on Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:57 pm

Could it not be a block policy....similar thing discussed here:

http://www.taxationweb.co.uk/forum/timing-of-receipts-via-intermediary-t34961.html?hilit=insurance#p127001

Not really with it yet (give me a couple more days ) - from memory this was a similar issue though ? :oops:
Do you adore to transfer your artistic and inventive qualities to renovate a part type? Perhaps your friends who tour your sanctuary head remarks about want they could levy you to change their premises.
Generix
 
Posts: 1778
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:41 pm


Return to VAT & Excise Duties

Dorifor Internet Marketing Dorifor Tax Group - our portfolio of tax sites:

UK's largest independent tax portal All the tax books on one site global tax seminars, conferences and other events Global tax jobs portal List of UK recruitment agencies and employers