I am sorry if I am wrong. I have mentioned FHL because this income (deduction in expense) has more proximity to the trading income rather than investment income.
I am sorry if I am wrong. I have mentioned FHL because this income (deduction in expense) has more proximity to the trading income rather than investment income.
I haven't checked this but I seem to recall that rental income from the letting of surplus trading premises (perhaps by concession rather than law?) could be treated as trading income as opposed to rental income.
section 44 wrote:I haven't checked this but I seem to recall that rental income from the letting of surplus trading premises (perhaps by concession rather than law?) could be treated as trading income as opposed to rental income.
Link to HMRC in fourth post on thread above re that.