by mr-woo1 on Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:37 pm
Yes its a single property and a single transaction.
My query was more if mixed use properties had each 'use' assessed independantly
Mixed use
A property might be classed as part residential and part non-residential - for example a shop with a flat above
.................................
Mixed use purchase example
A freehold property in a disadvantaged area is bought for a total of £300,000. It consists of a shop below and a flat above. It's worked out that the flat - which is only used for residential purposes - is 40 per cent of the whole property. So the cost of the flat is £120,000 and the cost of the shop is £180,000.
There's no SDLT to pay on the flat because Disadvantaged Areas Relief is available for residential property transactions of £150,000 or less.
But there will be SDLT to pay on the shop because:
* Disadvantaged Areas Relief isn't available for non-residential properties
* the amount paid for the shop element is above the threshold for non-residential properties (£150,000)
So SDLT is chargeable at the normal rate. In this example it's payable on the £180,000 paid for the shop at the rate of 1 per cent.
I appreciate this example includes reference to DA Relief, but each 'use' is still being assessed independantly which was what I was interested in.