maths wrote:However, in your example, if an instalment payment due in year 9 proves irrecoverable then the 4 year time limit would run from the end of year 9 (not the end of the tax year of the original disposal).
That is interesting and sounds very sensible indeed. I have to ask, but are you sure on this point? s48 is not exactly clear on this point.
Mullet, I think you're probably right that it is a Marren v Ingles asset. As the additional consideration is unexpected, the value of the asset at the time of original disposal was nil.