Thank you for the follow-up.
If Guido does not file a form NRL1 I think we all accept that his tenant should be withholding basic rate tax assuming the rent exceeds £100 per week.
Equally, if Maths accepts my point that a tenant does have the right to claw back tax not withheld from a landlord, Guido may at some stage suffer a cash flow disadvantage.
I accept the point that both you and King-Maker have made, but I also believe if Guido wishes to have the security of receiving 100% of his rent rather than rely on his tenant not complying with his/her UK tax withholding obligation, he is required to complete a form NRL1 i.e. providing tax advice based on someone else not complying with their UK tax withholding obligation is not sound.
As an aside, I started working in the expatriate tax department of a bank in the mid 1980s before the non-resident landlord scheme was in place and remember taking numerous calls from non-resident landlords who were upset their letting agents were withholding a large chunk of their rent each month. It reached such a level that for a small fee we started indemnifying letting agents against their risk so they stopped withholding tax. The letting agents were invariably happy with this arrangement as everyone knows a bank can't go bust
Kind Regards
etf
http://theexpatriatetaxfactory.com














