by Generix on Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:16 pm
Having looked at the law, it's not ringing any obvious bells as to what the problem was which we went to counsel on.
VATAs19 gives rules on valuation, then Sch6 p4 gives the vires for the prompt payment discount. All seems very clear. (re the case of Saga holidays (only Tribunal so no precedent set) I'm not quite sure how the trib came to their decision, putting the weight on the words ("reduced by the discount") but ignoring "whether or not payment is made in accordance with those terms".)
Re the disclosure, a VAT invoice must include details of any cash discount offered, however, B2C supplies do not require a VAT invoice to be issued.
Kitty > Also note that prompt payment is the only type of conditional discount which this treatment applies to - therefore adding other conditions to the prompt payment might jeopardize this treatment, which would mean the VAT reverts to the normal valuation rules and would be based on net consideration received, i.e. so discount only applies if taken/received.
Which leads me to believe the technical issue was something to do with valuation/retail scheme calculation and the commercial side of it, i.e. in a retail environment you pay immediately anyway, therefore it would be whether prompt payment could also apply to pre-payment and how far in advance it could/would have to be made, and also much like Debenhams how to make it clear to the customer the discount was available etc. I remember that the final idea was not very commercially friendly and therefore not taken up by anyone, albeit it wasn't 'sold' very hard to clients.
Do you adore to transfer your artistic and inventive qualities to renovate a part type? Perhaps your friends who tour your sanctuary head remarks about want they could levy you to change their premises.