| Home > Tax Articles > Capital Taxes > Deeds of Variation: CGT Aspects |
| Deeds of Variation: CGT Aspects |
 |
 |
|
Capital Tax Review by Matthew Hutton, MA, CTA (Fellow), AIIT, TEP Matthew Hutton MA, CTA (fellow), AIIT, TEP author of Capital Tax Review, comments on circumstances in which a deed of variation may not be desirable for CGT purposesContextIt is well known that, as against IHT (where a deed of variation is effective for all IHT purposes), the CGT provisions under TCGA 1992 s 62(6) simply prevent the variation itself from being a disposal. But the rest of the capital gains legislation (and specifically the anti-avoidance settlements rules, whether for UK or non-UK resident settlements under ss 77 and 86 respectively) continue to apply on the basis that the original beneficiary is the settlor.It is sometimes better not to electOn occasion, it will sometimes appear desirable not to import s62(6), for example in a case where the original beneficiary can secure a tax-free uplift based on main residence relief. Suppose that A dies leaving his one-half share in the family home to his wife B. B, who is still living in the house, decides to execute a deed of variation giving the share to the children. If some time has passed since death and the children are not in occupation, it might be better not to apply s62(6), to give the children the highest possible base cost. If this route is being considered, make sure that the administration of the estate has been completed. Otherwise, there is a serious danger that B will dispose of an asset (her right to due administration of the estate) with no base cost and no main residence relief.The CGT advantages of a pre-emptive appointmentWhat about a case where an asset is left to a discretionary trust and the trustees wish to appoint out to beneficiaries absolutely? If, by the time they decide to do this, the asset has risen in value, they must wait until two years have passed, to obtain hold-over relief on non-business assets (because there is no chargeable transfer: IHTA 1984 s144(2)). Even that may be undesirable if the beneficiaries may wish to occupy the property as their main residence in the future. In that case, consider an appointment by the trustees before the administration has been completed (see the HMRC Capital Gains Manual CG31432-31433): the beneficiary under the trust effectively takes on an acquisition value at the date of death.(Points made by Sarah Dunn at IBC’s Fourth Annual Private Client Tax Conference in London on 4 July 2005, included in a Meeting Points article in Taxation 8.9.05 p 638) CommentWhile generally it may be the case that CGT need not be considered in much detail for disposals within a year or two following death, it is always ‘the exception that proves the rule’. And there will be a number of cases where the gains, whether on a family home or on stocks and shares, can be quite considerable. It is then that the issue needs to be spotted well in advance and appropriate planning action adopted.October 2005 Matthew Hutton MA, CTA (fellow), AIIT, TEP author of Capital Tax Review More InformationThe above article has been taken from Matthew Hutton’s Capital Tax Review, a quarterly update for professional advisers of private clients. For more information, visit http://www.taxationweb.co.uk/books/capital_tax_review.php.About the AuthorMatthew Hutton is a non-practising solicitor (admitted 1979), who has specialised in tax for over 25 years. Having run his own consultancy (latterly through Matthew Hutton Ltd) until 30th September 2000, he now devotes his professional time to writing and lecturing.
|
|||
|
About The Author  Mark McLaughlin is TaxationWeb's Co-Founder, Director and Technical Editor. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation and a member of the Association of Taxation Technicians and the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. He lectures on tax subjects, is co-author of Tottel's IHT Annual and Ray & McLaughlin's IHT Planning, and Editor of Tottel's Tax Planning and Annual series. Mark's work has also been published in Taxation, Tax Adviser, Tolley's Practical Tax, Tax Journal and Simon's Weekly Tax Intelligence. Since January 1998, Mark has been a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provides tax consultancy and support services to professional firms. He publishes a regular 'Tax Update' e-Newsletter for clients and other professional firms. To receive future copies, contact Mark via his website. |
|||
|
Article Added Saturday, 03 December 2005 | 4959 Hits |
|||
Tax Insider Lite
Each month our tax experts reveal FREE tax strategies to help minimise your taxes. Get Tax Insider Lite:
Tax Books
BOOK OF THE WEEK
Capital Allowances for Fixtures: The New Rules
A full technical analysis of the proposed new rules re capital allowances for fixtures, as announced in the HMRC consultation document issued on 31 May 2011. It is based on the draft legislation published in December 2011.
BOOK OF THE MONTH
A-Z of Plant & Machinery
An analysis of more than 200 types of common expenditure, showing whether or not they qualify as plant or machinery. Each entry includes statutory and case law references, together with HMRC guidance and the authors? personal commentary.
Corporation Tax Memo 2011-2012
The first edition of this brand new publication, published in November, includes comprehensive commentary on all relevant legislation, case law and HMRC practice, including the recent Corporation Tax Acts and Finance Act 2011.
Capital Gains Tax Roll-over, Hold-over and Deferral Reliefs 2011/12
A unique and user-friendly reference guide to all the capital gains tax reliefs that may apply on the sale of businesses, business assets, and for gifts, including entrepreneurs' relief.
Share Valuation Handbook
Share Valuation Handbook brings together the practical methods of share valuation, the statutory requirements for a fiscal valuation and the decisions of the courts in a single volume.
PROUDLY SUPPORTING
