| Home > Tax Articles > General > Pension Contributions |
| Pension Contributions |
|
|
|
Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP outlines potential difficulties with 'in-specie' pension contributions. IntroductionIt is not uncommon for assets to be transferred to pension schemes instead of cash. However, are assets an acceptable form of pension contribution to a registered scheme for tax relief purposes? HM Revenue & Customs' Position on in specie ContributionsHMRC guidance categorically states in the context of employer contributions:
However, the same guidance then goes on to indicate when the contribution of an asset may be acceptable. It broadly states that there must be:
In terms of member contributions, HMRC states that contributions to a registered pension scheme must be a monetary amount (e.g., cash, cheque, direct debit, bank transfer) but then says; “…but what is allowed is for an individual to agree to pay a monetary contribution by way of a transfer of asset(s).” Stamp Duty Land Tax & Stamp DutyHowever, does an in-specie pension contribution as described by HMRC create a stamp duty or SDLT liability? For example, if the chargeable consideration for a land transaction consists of the satisfaction of a debt due to the purchaser, the debt amount is treated as chargeable consideration. A similar rule applies for stamp duty purposes (e.g., in relation to shares). The position is not altogether clear, and the CIOT has requested clarification from HMRC on this point. However, based on HMRC’s view that a cash debt must be created for tax relief to be available for a pension contribution which is satisfied by the consideration payable for the asset, it seems likely that stamp duty land tax or stamp duty liabilities would arise. Date of PaymentA further issue regarding pension contributions in specie is in establishing the date on which the contribution is ‘paid’ for tax purposes. HMRC’s view is understood to be that the time of payment is when the debt set-off actually takes place (i.e., when the pension scheme receives the asset value to set off against the pension contribution ‘debt’. For a land transfer, this would be the completion date, or for a share transfer this would presumably be when the stock transfer form was dealt with. Further issues potentially arise. For example, even if the in-specie pension contribution is acceptable, there are limits to the amount of tax relief available. In the case of companies there is also the question of the timing and extent of tax relief from business profits. The above article is reproduced from 'Practice Update' (November/December 2009), a Tax Newsletter produced by Mark McLaughlin Associates Ltd. To download current and past copies, visit: Practice Updates.
|
|||
|
About The Author ![]() Mark McLaughlin is TaxationWeb's Co-Founder, Director and Technical Editor. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation and a member of the Association of Taxation Technicians and the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. He lectures on tax subjects, is co-author of Tottel's IHT Annual and Ray & McLaughlin's IHT Planning, and Editor of Tottel's Tax Planning and Annual series. Mark's work has also been published in Taxation, Tax Adviser, Tolley's Practical Tax, Tax Journal and Simon's Weekly Tax Intelligence. Since January 1998, Mark has been a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provides tax consultancy and support services to professional firms. He publishes a regular 'Tax Update' e-Newsletter for clients and other professional firms. To receive future copies, contact Mark via his website. |
|||
|
Article Added Saturday, 02 January 2010 | 1434 Hits |
|||
















