UK'S LARGEST INDEPENDENT TAX WEBSITE
Are you a member ?
|
Home > Tax Articles > National Insurance contributions > Sleeping Partners and Saving Class 4 NIC
Sleeping Partners and Saving Class 4 NIC Print E-mail
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Share on Facebook

James Bailey reveals how a tax case could potentially enable some partners to enjoy a substantial National Insurance refund.

Class 2 NIC & Class 4 NIC for the Self-Employed

Class 2 National Insurance Contributions (NICs) are a fixed weekly amount (currently £2.40p per week) and Class 4 NIC is based on a percentage of your share of the partnership profits. The current rate is 8% of the profits between £5,715 and £43,875 (a maximum of £3,053) and 1% on any profits above £43,875.

Class 4 NIC is charged on the profits “immediately derived from the carrying on or exercise of one or more trades, professions or vocations”.

Sleeping Partners and National Insurance

A “sleeping partner” is a partner who does not take any part in the running of the partnership’s business. HMRC accept that such a partner is not liable to Class 4 NIC, because they do not fall within the definition above.

In the past, there has been a reluctance to classify a partner as a “sleeping partner”, particularly in the case of the standard husband and wife partnership. This was because there was a fear that HMRC would argue that the sleeping partner was not really entitled to their profit share, and that as a result the active partner had made a “settlement” on the sleeping partner by consenting to their having a share of profits they had not “earned”.

The fear was that HMRC would therefore seek to tax the active partner on the profits diverted to the sleeping partner – often with the result that those profits would be liable to income tax at 40% instead of the 20% they suffered in the hands of the sleeping partner.

“Arctic Systems” Case

In 2007 however, a tax case known as the “Arctic Systems” case went to the House of Lords, and the taxpayer won. In that case, a husband and wife had set up a limited company which received Mr Jones’ (the husband's) earnings as a software engineer, and paid them out in dividends to Mr Jones and to his wife.

HMRC tried to argue that because Mr Jones had effectively given his wife the opportunity to enjoy the dividends from the company, he should pay tax (at 40%) on all of them. HMRC lost, and in their judgement, the Lords made it clear that the same argument would apply to a sleeping partner – each partner was taxable on their share of the profits, and HMRC could not tax the active partner on the profits of the sleeping partner.

This means that in a case where one of the partners does not actually get involved in running the business, that partner is not liable to Class 4 NIC. If they have in fact been paying their £3,000-plus of Class 4 NIC per year, they can make a claim for “error or mistake” relief to get it back.

Practical Tip - Claim your National Insurance Refund

If you believe you have a case for reclaiming your class 4 NIC, you should first discuss the implications with a tax adviser, as the situation may not be quite as simple as this article suggests, but in many cases, there may be a useful windfall from a claim for repayment of around £10,000.

Comments
Only registered users can write comments!

About The Author

James Bailey

James Bailey is the Tax Partner at Robinson Reed Layton, a well-known firm of Chartered Accountants and Chartered Tax Advisers in Cornwall. He advises family businesses and their owners, and other wealthy individuals. He provides advice on tax planning together with help in dealing with tax investigations.

He began his career as an Inspector of Taxes with HMRC, latterly as the Deputy District Inspector of a large London tax district. He ran investigations into the tax affairs of individuals and companies, ranging from local businesses to national companies and a few well-known media figures!

After leaving HMRC, he worked with two of the “Big 4” accounting firms, specialising in tax planning for family companies and wealthy individuals. He advised such businesses on how to minimise their tax liabilities, and their owners on how to reduce or eliminate the Capital Gains Tax due when the business was sold. He also helped the owners of family businesses to pass them on to the next generation without any Inheritance Tax becoming due. As an ex-Inspector of Taxes, he also dealt with HMRC tax investigations, both at local level and with more serious cases involving HMRC’s Special Compliance Office.

James has appeared on TV and radio to comment on taxation issues, and written articles on tax planning for various professional journals.

He is also the author of:

  • 27 Ways to Beat the Taxman
  • How to Master a Tax Investigation
  • How to Successfully Plan for Inheritance Tax

All these titles are available from www.taxinsider.co.uk

Article Added Monday, 14 June 2010 | 1584 Hits

 

Your attention is drawn to the disclaimer on this site, which applies to the content in this section.

Hitwise Award Winner Apr-Jun 2008 Hitwise Award Winner Jul-Sep 2008 Hitwise Award Winner Oct-Dec 2008 Hitwise Award Winner Jan-Jun 2009 Hitwise Award Winner Jul-Dec 2009 Hitwise Award Winner Jan-Jun 2011 Alexa - Most popular news and media website

TaxationWeb Limited (Registered in England No. 4571386), 6 Coleby Avenue, Peel Hall, Manchester, M22 5HH, United Kingdom

Information which you supply whilst using this website may be held in our computer records and may be used to send you information which we think might be of interest to you. If you do not want your information to be used for such purposes please write to us at: 6 Coleby Avenue, Peel Hall, Manchester M22 5HH, UK, or email us

Website by Dorifor Internet Marketing