UK'S LARGEST INDEPENDENT TAX WEBSITE
Are you a member ?
|
Home > Tax News > Professional Bodies > Arctic Systems goes to Lords
Arctic Systems goes to Lords Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Share on Facebook

The House of Lords will give a concluding hearing in the case of Jones v Garnett ("Arctic Systems") this week.

This case focuses on whether dividends paid by the company (Arctic Systems Limited) to a working shareholder (Mrs Jones) consisted of income arising under a settlement as defined by ICTA 1988, s 660A(1) and so should be treated as the income of her spouse, who was a director and IT contractor.

This case is of particular importance because it examines whether, in a husband and wife company set up, paying low salaries and distributing the remaining profits by dividend creates a statutory settlement for the purposes of s 660A. It also looks at whether this situation can be described as an outright gift of property within s 660A(6) (exemption from settlement provisions for outright gifts between spouses).

In response to this announcement the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) expressed alarm at how the couple (Mr and Mrs Jones) have been dragged, seemingly unnecessarily, through the legal system. The case originally went to the Court of Appeal in autumn 2005, being won in December 2005. But HMRC appealed and the case has hung in limbo until this week.

Chas Roy-Chowdhury, Head of Taxation at ACCA, said: “The ‘Arctic Systems’ tax case has been hanging around for far too long. It seems the government is determined to prove a point by allowing HM Revenue & Customs to appeal against the Court’s decision back in December 2005. The delay in this legal ruling has left many family companies in a quandary about how to complete their tax forms with regards to dividend payments.”

Roy-Chowdhury added: “We really hope the Lords’ decision will fall on the side of Artic Systems. Geoff and Diana Jones have been through quite enough already. And the Jones’ being pursued through the legal system means the case will be costly to the UK taxpayer.

Link

Association of Chartered Certified Accountants

Comments
Only registered users can write comments!

About The Author

Sarah Laing

Sarah Laing
Editor, TaxationWeb News

Sarah is a Chartered Tax Adviser. She has been writing professionally since joining CCH Editions in 1998 as a Senior Technical Editor, contributing to a range of highly regarded publications including the British Tax Reporter, Taxes - The Weekly Tax News, the Red & Green legislation volumes, Hardman's, International Tax Agreements and many others. She became Publishing Manager for the tax and accounting portfolio in 2001 and later went on to help run CCH Seminars (including ABG Courses and Conferences).

Sarah originally worked for the Inland Revenue in Newbury and Swindon Tax Offices, before moving out into practice in 1991. She has worked for both small and Big 5 firms. She now works as a freelance author providing technical writing services for the tax and accountancy profession.

Article Added Tuesday, 05 June 2007 | 1139 Hits

 

Your attention is drawn to the disclaimer on this site, which applies to the content in this section.

Hitwise Award Winner Apr-Jun 2008 Hitwise Award Winner Jul-Sep 2008 Hitwise Award Winner Oct-Dec 2008 Hitwise Award Winner Jan-Jun 2009 Hitwise Award Winner Jul-Dec 2009 Hitwise Award Winner 2011 Alexa - Most popular news and media website

TaxationWeb Limited (Registered in England No. 4571386), 6 Coleby Avenue, Peel Hall, Manchester, M22 5HH, United Kingdom

Information which you supply whilst using this website may be held in our computer records and may be used to send you information which we think might be of interest to you. If you do not want your information to be used for such purposes please write to us at: 6 Coleby Avenue, Peel Hall, Manchester M22 5HH, UK, or email us

Website by Dorifor Internet Marketing