| Home > Tax News > Professional Bodies > CIOT comments on REPO transaction case |
| CIOT comments on REPO transaction case |
 |
 |
|
The High Court has upheld the decision of the Special Commissioners in D'Arcy v HMRC. According to the case report, the taxpayer had entered into a REPO transaction for the sole purpose of reducing her income tax liability. This transaction had created a manufactured interest deduction under the REPO legislation. HMRC contended, at first, that the Ramsay principle applied to the transaction as a whole to deny a deduction for the manufactured interest. However, they later abandoned this argument and contended instead that the deduction was allowable but that an almost equal amount of income was taxable under the accrued income scheme.The Special Commissioner held that there was no charge under the accrued income scheme. The High Court agreed.Henderson J said that HMRC's real complaint appeared to be that the accrued income scheme legislation does not throw up a charge to counterbalance the deduction available to the taxpayer under the REPO legislation. He pointed out that the accrued income scheme legislation and the REPO legislation were enacted at different times with different purposes, and do not form part of a single unified code. He described the case as one of those “which will inevitably occur from time to time in a tax system as complicated as ours, where a well-advised taxpayer has been able to take advantage of an unintended gap left by the interaction between two different sets of statutory provisions.” John Cullinane, President of The Chartered Institute of Taxation, comments: “The lesson to be drawn from this is that it is the complexity of the legislation that gave this taxpayer the opportunity to reduce her tax liability in a way that HMRC clearly did not approve of. This points to the folly of repeatedly counteracting avoidance by introducing new complexity into the legislation, which not only increases the compliance burdens on the majority of taxpayers, but results in more, rather than less, 'disapproved of' opportunities of this type.” Link Chartered Institute of Taxation
|
|||
|
About The Author  Sarah Laing Sarah is a Chartered Tax Adviser. She has been writing professionally since joining CCH Editions in 1998 as a Senior Technical Editor, contributing to a range of highly regarded publications including the British Tax Reporter, Taxes - The Weekly Tax News, the Red & Green legislation volumes, Hardman's, International Tax Agreements and many others. She became Publishing Manager for the tax and accounting portfolio in 2001 and later went on to help run CCH Seminars (including ABG Courses and Conferences). Sarah originally worked for the Inland Revenue in Newbury and Swindon Tax Offices, before moving out into practice in 1991. She has worked for both small and Big 5 firms. She now works as a freelance author providing technical writing services for the tax and accountancy profession. |
|||
|
Article Added Monday, 12 February 2007 | 1003 Hits |
|||
Tax Insider Lite
Each month our tax experts reveal FREE tax strategies to help minimise your taxes. Get Tax Insider Lite:
Tax Books
BOOK OF THE WEEK
Tax Planning 2012/13
BOOK OF THE MONTH
Dealing with HMRC Investigations 2012/13
PROUDLY SUPPORTING
