| Home > Tax News > Professional Bodies > Multinationals moving their headquarters |
Multinationals moving their headquarters |
 |
 |
|
During the last few weeks there has been speculation about whether more multinationals based in the UK would move their headquarters to another country. The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) believes that the main factor that has prompted this is the climate of uncertainty caused by inadequate pre-consultation on changes that have been made in successive Budgets and Pre-Budget Reports (PBRs). This has meant that international business structures have to be regularly rearranged to deal with the latest changes.Ian Menzies-Conacher, Chairman of the CIOT’s Technical Committee, says: “Regarding the substance of the recent proposals on foreign profits, the Government does have a need, which we recognise, to protect the corporate tax base.” The CIOT believes, however that protecting the UK tax base could be achieved more effectively, and less disruptively, by more targeted measures than the 'controlled companies' regime envisaged by the foreign profits proposals. These would be very compliance-burdensome by requiring detailed annual calculations in respect of many, if not all, overseas subsidiaries of a UK headed group or subgroup. Historically little revenue has been raised on profits earned outside the UK - appropriately so, as they are mostly taxed in other countries, sometimes at high effective rates. The focus of the proposals on what should therefore be a very secondary area, a tightened CC regime, has also fuelled fears that the package is, despite its stated intention, a revenue-raising one. Ian Menzies-Conacher adds: “The Chartered Institute of Taxation believes that consultation is the key to producing tax law that achieves the Government's objectives. The Government adopted a good approach in producing the discussion document last year to canvas opinion. It is far better to use the various consultation mechanisms available - informal, formal and responses to consultation documents - than to produce a 'rabbit from a hat'. As tax is complex, the latter almost inevitably leads to unintended consequences and it is much better to take the time necessary to get it right. The whole point of a consultative approach is to listen to what is said, reflect on it and consider proposed changes. Where a consultative approach has been employed from the start, the CIOT does not think that it is accurate or helpful to describe this process in terms of ‘u-turns’ or climb downs.”
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.26
3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."
|
|||||||
|
About The Author  Sarah Laing Sarah is a Chartered Tax Adviser. She has been writing professionally since joining CCH Editions in 1998 as a Senior Technical Editor, contributing to a range of highly regarded publications including the British Tax Reporter, Taxes - The Weekly Tax News, the Red & Green legislation volumes, Hardman's, International Tax Agreements and many others. She became Publishing Manager for the tax and accounting portfolio in 2001 and later went on to help run CCH Seminars (including ABG Courses and Conferences). Sarah originally worked for the Inland Revenue in Newbury and Swindon Tax Offices, before moving out into practice in 1991. She has worked for both small and Big 5 firms. She now works as a freelance author providing technical writing services for the tax and accountancy profession. |
|||||||
|
Article Added Tuesday, 20 May 2008 |
|||||||
Information
Help
Resources
About
PROUDLY SUPPORTING
