UK Tax Information
Tax books
TAX DOCTOR

Mark McLaughlin

Mark McLaughlin
CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, General Editor of TaxationWeb, selects a 'question of the month' from TaxationWeb's Forum

Have you got a tax question? Post it on the Tax Tips Forum and it may be answered either by Mark McLaughlin or one of the other Forum contributors.

August 2006

Introduction

This month's Tax Clinic concerns a family home owned jointly by husband and wife, although the comments below apply equally to civil partners. The following query does not specifically state that the advice they have been given is inheritance tax (IHT) advice, but this is assumed to be the case.

Property in England and Wales may be owned in an individual's sole name (e.g. husband, wife or civil partner), or as joint tenants, or as tenants in common (different rules are understood to apply in Scotland, for example).

What is the difference between the above forms of joint ownership?

On the death of a 'joint tenant', the survivor takes the entire interest absolutely by operation of law. Therefore it is not possible to leave an interest in jointly tenanted property to a third party, because this interest accrues automatically to the surviving joint tenant. It may be possible to vary this position following the joint tenant's death, but severance by a 'deed of variation' is outside the scope of this Tax Clinic.

By contrast, ownership as 'tenants in common' gives each spouse a separate (typically equal) share of the property, which can be left by will or disposed of during lifetime. This is frequently found to be the most satisfactory form of ownership from both an IHT planning and practical point of view.

Q:

My wife and I are buying a property to live in. We have been told that we should become tenants in common as opposed to joint owners. Is this good advice?

A:

Editor's Comments

As the comments below indicate, ownership as tenants in common offers some flexibility in terms of leaving a share in the family home to someone other than the surviving spouse on the first death. However, whether any IHT savings are achievable in doing so will depend on individual circumstances. And whether it is desirable to give a share of the family home to someone else in any event needs to be considered very carefully.

If the property is held by husband and wife (or civil partners) as joint tenants and the parties wish to sever the joint tenancy so that they become tenants in common instead, a simple form of severance notice should suffice. This notice should be given during lifetime because a joint tenancy cannot be severed by will (although a deed of variation can achieve this result). It is preferable for a severance to be agreed and signed by both parties.

Gifts or legacies between spouses (or civil partners) are generally exempt from IHT (although this exemption is restricted to £55,000 if the recipient or survivor is not domiciled in the UK.) If a joint interest in the family home (or any other asset) is left to the surviving spouse, the transfer would not normally utilise the IHT 'nil rate band'. The property interest would be included in the estate of the survivor, thus increasing his or her estate. This may have implications for IHT on the second death.

The thinking behind leaving an interest in the home (as tenants in common) to a non-exempt beneficiary, such as adult children or a family trust, is that it can often prevent the nil rate band being wasted on the first death. On the face of it, this seems like a straightforward exercise. In fact, it can potentially be an extremely complex area of IHT planning and specific, expert professional advice is therefore essential. The brief replies below to the forum query are perhaps a good indication of this.

Responses from contributors included:

Lee Young:

If your estates will subject to IHT and you wish to set up IHT efficient wills then you will probably need to own your new home as beneficial tenants in common.

mgn1957:

I agree with Lee Young that holding a property as tenants in common is a pre-requisite to IHT planning but can also be useful if, for example, the parties have made unequal contributions to the purchase price or have children from a previous marriage. The advice is neutral - the rationale behind the advice is all important.

Peter D:

Very good advice. What annoys me is when people use a solicitor, Lawyer of the BS legal reps they very rarely ask how you want the deeds held.

Add your comments

To visit the above query on the Tax Forum, including any updates, click here.

Tax Doctor

Your attention is drawn to the disclaimer on this site, which applies to the content in this section.


<< back to Tax Doctor index | go to Tax Tips Forum >>

Quick Find:
Search
log in or sign on
INFORMATION
Budget 2006
Tax News
Tax Articles
'1 Minute' Guides
Property Tax
Business Tax
Tax Investments
Capital Taxes
VAT & Customs Duty
UK & International
...Tax Law

US Tax
French Tax
Stamp Duties
National Insurance
Tax Students
 
HELP
Tax Tips Forum
Tax Doctor
Find a Professional
 
RESOURCES
Important Tax Dates
Tax Jobs
Tax Books
Tax Events
Tax Software
Tax Reviews
Tax Glossary
Newsletter
 
ABOUT US
About Us
Advertisers
PressRoom
Contact Us

 


TaxationWeb Limited (Registered in England No. 4571386), 6 Coleby Avenue, Peel Hall, Manchester, M22 5HH, United Kingdom

Information which you supply whilst using this website may be held in our computer records and may be used to send you information which we think might be of interest to you. If you do not want your information to be used for such purposes please write to us at: 6 Coleby Avenue, Peel Hall, Manchester M22 5HH, UK, or email us

Copyright © 2000 - 2008, TaxationWeb Ltd. | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Website by: Dorifor Internet Marketing

Page generated: 20 August 2008

Sign on for FREE membership TaxationWeb members login