This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

Are all "funds" funds?

pledger
Posts:3
Joined:Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:45 pm
Are all "funds" funds?

Postby pledger » Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:29 pm

Hello -

UK resident, I have a managed portfolio in Switzerland. The Bank churns the holdings quite a lot (to good ends) but it means that reporting of dividends and CG to HMRC is getting onerous, and I am considering switching everything into a "fund" managed by the same bank.

My question is, will the HMRC accept top level reporting - one number each for dividend, CG etc (like they do for a UK fund) or would they require full transparency and require the underlying transactions to be disclosed (which would probably be even more numerous than in my present situation)?

Yes, I could ask them, but as we all know, that is easier said than done

Thanks for any thoughts on this

DavidTreitel
Posts:271
Joined:Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: Are all "funds" funds?

Postby DavidTreitel » Fri Dec 08, 2017 9:43 pm

Will the new investment wrapper be a UK reporting fund or a non-reporting fund? If a non-reporting fund, why is it considered suitable?

pledger
Posts:3
Joined:Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:45 pm

Re: Are all "funds" funds?

Postby pledger » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:20 am

Thanks David - that question has given me the key words to search the HMRC pages.

It is looking like it would be a non-reporting fund (ISIN number is not on the giant spreadsheet), so I just have to work out what the UK tax consequences of being a non-reporting fund are. It is hard going for a layman to interpret the HMRC manual :-(

Thanks again

Phil

maths
Posts:8507
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:25 pm

Re: Are all "funds" funds?

Postby maths » Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:40 pm

It seems you want to effectively have a single investment. If you invest in a fund or fund of funds that's what you will have (be they shares or units).

You will then not need to worry for tax purposes what investments are bought and sold by the fund or funds. You tax exposure will be simply dividends and/or interest and gains/losses (if sold) arising on your investment.

This applies whether the funds are reporting or non-resporting. The key distinction here is that on the latter any "gains" made on sales by you will be subject to income tax not capital gains tax.

pledger
Posts:3
Joined:Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:45 pm

Re: Are all "funds" funds?

Postby pledger » Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:03 pm

Thanks for your plain English reply, "maths".

So if I stay within the 20% income tax band there is no effect on total tax, and I have a whole lot less reporting to do. If I go above this (40% tax bracket) I will be losing out.

P

maths
Posts:8507
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:25 pm

Re: Are all "funds" funds?

Postby maths » Sat Dec 09, 2017 5:55 pm

Whether you invest in a reporting fund or directly into many different shares etc the income tax and capita gains tax treatments are the same including the same rates of tax.

Non-reporting funds are different.

But basically you should have less reporting matters.

As always,depends upon the facts,


Return to “International Tax”