This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

Am I liable for CGT when it is my sons property

HT69
Posts:3
Joined:Sun Jun 10, 2018 11:51 am
Am I liable for CGT when it is my sons property

Postby HT69 » Sun Jun 10, 2018 4:46 pm

My son was initially finding it difficult to get a mortgage so his financial advisor suggested I (his father) should support him with the mortgage and therfore also put my name on the deeds.

However the deposit and all other expenses to date was made by my son.

The property has been let out over the years.Last year my son asked his mortgage company if they would approve the mortgage solely in his name and they approved.

A transfer of equity took place and the deeds are solely in my son's name now.I always said the property belong to him as all money and expenses had been made by him and we should correct the ownership situation.

I have therefore made no gain at all.Am i still liable for Capital Gain Tax??And does Inheritance tax applies??

bd6759
Posts:4267
Joined:Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:26 pm

Re: Am I liable for CGT when it is my sons property

Postby bd6759 » Sun Jun 10, 2018 6:45 pm

Was the loan in joint names?

AnthonyR
Posts:322
Joined:Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:33 pm

Re: Am I liable for CGT when it is my sons property

Postby AnthonyR » Tue Jul 10, 2018 1:02 pm

What probably should have happened at the time of the purchase is that your solicitor should have drafted a declaration of trust showing that you were holding the legal interest on trust for your son. However, in my experience these things are often missed by conveyancers who are just focused on getting the job done.

In theory you would have had an implied declaration of trust meaning that you did not have a beneficial entitlement and on the transfer you simply transferred the share you were holding on trust for your son.

It won't be bullet proof, but I'd suggest putting together a statement between you and your son to that effect in case HMRC ever challenge the position.
Anthony Rogers LLB CTA TEP
Fusion Partners LLP
anthony@fusionpartners.co.uk

maths
Posts:8507
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:25 pm

Re: Am I liable for CGT when it is my sons property

Postby maths » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:06 pm

A transfer of equity took place and the deeds are solely in my son's name now
Are you saying that at the date of the original purchase in joint names (on the legal title and the mortgage) a declaration of trust (on the TR1 or separately) gave you a beneficial interest?

If not then no problem arises on the subsequent removal of your name from the legal title and mortgage.

If you were initially granted a beneficial interest then prima facie you have made a subsequent disposal for CGT.

Who received the rental income and declared it on their Tax Return?

Arguing an implied trust may be somewhat difficult if you were shown as a beneficial holder.


Return to “Inheritance Tax, IHT, Trusts & Estates, Capital Taxes”