This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

release of equity from unsold previous primary residence

sunrise21
Posts:8
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:27 pm

Postby sunrise21 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:05 am

My wife bought a house in 1999 for £70000. We married in 2002 and in 2004 wanted to buy a new property together. We couldn't get a quick sale on my wife's house so I bought the new property in my own name and we rented out her house. We remortgaged her house to reduce the mortgage on the new house and decided to rent out her old house instead. Now we have been told that we can only offset the interest payments against tax on the original purchase price, not the remortgage. Is this correct? If it is, how can we effectively release the equity in her house and have a rental property which is more maximally mortgaged without selling her house and buying a new rental property? Is joint ownership of both properties an option, or is there a more straightforward way of sorting this out? We would appreciate any advice! Thanks

King_Maker
Posts:6538
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:22 pm

Postby King_Maker » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:20 am

Not necessarily.

It will depend on the value of the property when the rental business commenced. This is the maximum loan on which the interest is allowable against the rental income.

I would be surprised if this is less than the original purchase price.

CDavey9501@aol.com
Posts:513
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:13 pm

Postby CDavey9501@aol.com » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:20 am

No, it is value at date first let out that is relevant.

CDavey9501@aol.com
Posts:513
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:13 pm

Postby CDavey9501@aol.com » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:23 am

Sorry. Posted without seeing Kingmaker's reply.

King_Maker
Posts:6538
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:22 pm

Postby King_Maker » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:31 am

I think we posted at ~ the same time. :)


Return to “Property Taxation”