This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

SDLT and bare ownership in Italy

AGoodman
Posts:2159
Joined:Fri May 16, 2014 3:47 pm
Re: SDLT and bare ownership in Italy

Postby AGoodman » Thu Mar 16, 2023 11:52 am

https://www.blakemorgan.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Downloads/Stamp-Duty-Land-Tax-First-Time-Buyers-Relief-29052019.pdf

gmmaio94
Posts:1
Joined:Mon Jun 15, 2026 11:51 am

Re: SDLT and bare ownership in Italy

Postby gmmaio94 » Mon Jun 15, 2026 11:56 am

FA 2003 Sch 4ZA para 16(2)(a) specifically provides that references to "major interest" in a dwelling are to an equivalent interest in a dwelling under the law of that country or territory.

Sch 4ZA para 11 provides that where a person is a beneficiary under a settlement and the beneficiary is entitled to occupy the dwelling for life then the beneficiary (not the trustee) is to be treated as holding the interest in the dwelling.
In such a case the beneficiary will have an interest in possession.

HMRC have confirmed (albeit for IHT) that in principle it will usually treat a usufruct (the right to use and enjoy another's property) as an interest in possession trust for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes. There is no reason to believe they would adopt a different approach for SDLT.

Accordingly, as you are not the interest in possession beneficiary under the Italian usufruct you are not treated as having a major interest in the Italian property.

Hence, no 3% SDLT charge.


Unless the solicitor is able to produce a cogent counter argument to the contrary he/she has no grounds for forcing you to incur the additional 3% charge. A suggestion from him/her that you could pay the 3% and then reclaim if appropriate is not a satisfactory response. A confirmation from you in writing as to the nature of your position re the Italian property together with the above argument should be sufficient to cover their "backside" which is in effect what they are worried about.
Hi Maths, I am in the same situation as this person now in 2026. Would you have an email address I can contact you in private? Happy to pay for any compensation. Thanks


Return to “Stamp Duty, Stamp Duty Land Tax, SDLT”