This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm
Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Thu Sep 19, 2024 8:09 am

I've gone back to the FOI people because if HMRC doesn't know how much work they have on hand at any given time that is a failure of management....and they have form for denying requests if the answer is embarrassing...see NRCGT thread in CGT.

I was also too kind in my original post....the wait was 9 months not 8 months as stated.

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Thu Sep 26, 2024 10:07 am

Last week my train was 20 mins into London. The guard informed everyone they could claim compensation and a lady passenger who clearly thought GWR's management were inept as HMRC's encouraged the whole carriage to make a claim, giving top tips on how to obtain a refund of dosh. This got me thinking.

I suspect the Government told the train companies they had to offer compensation where trains run late (a good thing), but if I were a train company boss I would turn around to the Government and ask why a well publicised compensation scheme is not in place for HMRC's failings and late runnings. After all 20 minutes is a drop in the ocean at HMRC...they are sometimes over 12 months late....there are still 2022/23 tax returns filed by 31 Jan 2024 that are yet to be worked by HMRC.

Over to you train company bosses.

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Thu Sep 26, 2024 10:09 am

PS Reeves would have Harra out of post in no time once she saw the compensation outflow.

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Fri Sep 27, 2024 11:53 am

This would be hilarious if it wasn't true...where do we find these forgetful Captains of Organisations?


By FactChecker
26th Sep 2024 02:04
Just in case anyone else is tempted to track down Dr Duckett's YouTube videos ... I took the wrong steer in my previous post from Richard.
Whilst the 4-part "Psychology, Plagiarism and the Post Office Scandal" set is short and snappy, it is frankly not that gripping and waffles quite a bit.

However the lengthier "Post Office Scandal - shifty Tim Parker" is absolutely brilliant ... and even explains some of my questions about Harra/HMRC (as when he shows how Parker slowly realises his competence is being questioned - a possibility that he had thought inconceivable).

It is both exhausting and exhaustive, but the explanations (and demolitions) are painstakingly clear and accurate ... and any viewer will truly learn a lot.

It's at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XR5Q4WzT2c ... enjoy!


Replying to FactChecker:

By Yossarian
27th Sep 2024 10:42
It's interesting how many CEOs, chairs, senior civil servants and politicians appear to suffer from memory loss in such situations. Is there an epidemic of early onset dementia amongst the highly paid in the UK? If they struggle to remember so many of the key details of how they ran an organisation such a relatively short time ago, what exactly were they being paid for?


Replying to Yossarian:
Tornado
By Tornado
27th Sep 2024 11:43
Recollections may vary

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Wed Oct 30, 2024 11:25 pm

HMRC's hierarchy have called themselves 'world class'.....wake up and smell the coffee! Will Harra be allowed to slip away before all 2022/23 tax returns filed last January have been processed?

Today TaxWatch publishes our latest State of Tax Administration Report, analysing data from the HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) Annual Report and Accounts and Freedom of Information requests for the 2023-24 year. The report highlights many of the challenges faced by HMRC, including falling staff numbers and problems with staff retention, causing poor customer service and ongoing tax compliance issues.

In 2023-24 HMRC collected more tax than ever, totalling £834.4 billion, at a cost of £5.5 billion. The report demonstrates that for every £1 invested in HMRC in compliance, the return is in the region of £17. However, the current CEO of HMRC Sir Jim Harra, who will step down in early 2025, admitted during the year that HMRC did not have the resources necessary competently fulfil its role as tax administrator and collector.

Despite hiring an additional 1,000 extra staff, blowing their budget by £36 million, callers to HMRC waited an average of 23 minutes to speak to an advisor, with millions unable to get through at all.

The department’s staff has shrunk in the year, with experienced workers leaving faster than they can be replaced. The new Labour government has promised to invest in HMRC, pledging an additional 5,000 new HMRC staff, including recruiting 500 new ‘tax professionals’ in 2024-25. However, the inability to retain staff, and the time it takes to train new recruits, undermines efforts to boost HMRC’s workforce to cope with the demands of compliance and customer service.

In order to reduce the tax gap and ensure that taxpayers pay what is due HMRC needs experienced and knowledgeable staff, who are paid well and given the tools to do their job. On the basis of a very positive return on compliance of £17 for every £1 invested that HMRC achieved in 2023-24 it is therefore a political decision as to whether the government wants to invest in HMRC, for the long term, to ensure that it is properly resourced to fulfil its role.

Although HMRC scored a great success in the Bernie Ecclestone case, netting £650 million in taxes, interest and penalties, simple mistakes and errors in Tribunals have cost millions in lost tax revenues, highlighting the need for a review of HMRC’s compliance processes to identify where things are going wrong.

Worryingly, the number of enquiries and criminal investigations opened and closed during the year continues to fall, as HMRC’s approach is ever more focussed on passive ‘nudge letters’ where large groups of taxpayers are written to asking them to confirm they have their affairs in order. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that this approach is a symptom of under resourcing and degrading tax technical skills with cutbacks to professional training.

Claire Aston, Director of TaxWatch reflects on the findings of the report, “We argue for a strong and capable HMRC, which is fully resourced, willing and capable of using all its powers to ensure the right amounts of tax are paid. Unfortunately, our report highlights that HMRC is falling short in its customer service and on ensuring compliance with tax laws.”

“Basic procedural slip ups, and lack of use of some of HMRC’s recent criminal powers undermine the deterrent effect and make it harder for the department to collect the revenue due. The Government must recognise the vital importance of HMRC to the UK public finances and invest appropriately to restore confidence and ensure its success. At the same time, HMRC must look to address its retention issues, improve tax technical skills and deliver on its customer service promises. It is fair to say that whoever succeeds Sir Jim Harra, has a tough job on their hands”.

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:59 pm

Another echo chamber proving to be on the money...even Sir Jim seems to be agreeing! If he hadn't hugely overspent available funds on MTD (his choice) areas of service would not have been as bad as they have been. The army should have been drafted in when this thread started.


Public Accounts Committee: Service levels improving, claim HMRC bosses
29 Nov 2024
HMRC chief executive Sir Jim Harra has apologised for poor HMRC service levels during an evidence session with the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, but assured MPs that service levels are now “significantly better” and he expects improvements to be sustained next year.

This is the first time HMRC bosses have appeared before the newly formed committee in this Parliament. Harra, alongside Myrtle Lloyd, HMRC’s Director General for Customer Services, and Justin Holliday, Chief Financial Officer and Tax Assurance Commissioner, faced tough questioning during a two-hour session on issues from helpline closures to whether HMRC will institute a callback service.

Customer service

Harra acknowledged poor levels of customer service had continued into the first half of this financial year, but reassured the committee that, since October, they have been “significantly better”. He said HMRC advisers had been hitting the target of dealing with 85% of call attempts “and expect to sustain that for remainder of this year and with the resources we’ve been given for 25-26 for next year.”

Nesil Caliskan (Labour) why callers were being cut off after waiting on hold for 70 minutes, with almost 7,000 calls experiencing this in 2022-23. Myrtle Lloyd explained this is a “technological limiter”, as long backlogs of callers on hold “brings the system down”.

She acknowledged this was “not ideal”. Caliskan said her constituents call it “appalling”. Lloyd Hatton (Labour) said HMRC’s services were “completely broken”.

The panel agreed to look at whether they could implement a warning for customers to tell them they would be cut off after 70 minutes. Lloyd added that a callback system “will be part of our requirements” when HMRC moves to a new platform.


Caliskan said issues with navigating HMRC’s digital services were partly to blame for long telephone queues, saying: “this idea that people are hanging on for hours with HMRC just for the fun of it when actually they could just go to digital services is not quite the accurate picture is it?”

“Being cut off is not just bad customer service,” she added. “It is an organization that is, deliberately it seems, trying to put you off from ever phoning HMRC again.”

Harra gave “a categorical reassurance” that that is not HMRC’s motivation. But “the simple fact is that in recent years we have not had sufficient resources to handle all of the contact that we receive, and therefore we have to try to reduce the avoidable contact by, for example, encouraging customers to do things online for themselves, and also try to prioritise the contact that we do deal with”.

Lloyd said HMRC are “constantly tweaking our digital services based on customer feedback”, with Harra adding: “We have not had sufficient resources to handle all of the contact that we receive, and therefore we have to try to reduce the avoidable contact by, for example, encouraging customers to do things online for themselves, and also try to prioritise the contact that we do deal with”.

Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat) said research has found that HMRC advisers have not complied with procedures in a third of calls, and asked why staff without the required level of proficiency were permitted to answer calls.

Lloyd said many of these were new or temporary staff in training and she was “confident” that levels would improve in the next report. She added that advice results in 97% of customers paying the right amount of tax.

Phoneline closures

While Harra told the committee that there are “no plans” to close helplines again, he was unable to offer a guarantee when pressed. However, he said that while he was in charge there would be no closures of helplines. He steps down from his role in March.

On the decision to close HMRC helplines in March, which was reversed the following day, Hatton said: “Surely you must accept that this one day car crash has done lasting damage to the credibility of HMRC.”

Harra admitted that earlier pilots of helpline closures revealed “a high degree of scepticism about whether people would be able to get the services they needed”. However, he added: “Given the position we were in at that time, if we had done nothing, we were going to get levels of demand that we simply could not service.”

Harra said he provides “advice and options”, but “the choices ultimately are for ministers”. Asked if they made the wrong choice, he added: “That’s not for me to say. Clearly the decision was changed pretty quickly, so a different judgment was reached very quickly.”

Harra said HMRC have “actually struggled” to find an evidential link between customer service and tax compliance, which would help with calls for extra funding. “It would be an extra way of persuading the Treasury that it is something to invest in, if we could show that there are tax revenues at stake,” he said. “It’s actually very difficult to prove evidentially.”

“I agree of course that the service levels that we gave in the last couple of years and in the first half of this year, are far, far below the levels that we would want to give, and I can understand why customers are dissatisfied with that, and I am dissatisfied with that as well,” Harra continued.

Digitalisation

Harra said 70% of all interactions with HMRC are now digital, with the figure close to 100% in some areas, such as employers PAYE.

However, he said the move towards digitialisation was being held back by both a lack of awareness and a lack of confidence.

“There is some unawareness of the extent of our digital services,” he said. “We currently have a campaign going on, which started on 4 November, to increase awareness of our digital services, particularly our mobile app. To some extent, I think it is also a lack of confidence, because tax can be complicated. We know that customers like reassurance.”

Clive Betts (Labour), who chaired the meeting in the absence of Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, asked why customers can do VAT registration online but are often unable to monitor the progress of this. Harra acknowledged there is no “track your parcel” type service, but added: “If it is something that will significantly reduce avoidable contact, it will be prioritised in our investment plan.” Digitalisation “is increasingly about improving existing services rather than extending them”, he continued.

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Thu Dec 12, 2024 8:02 am

Great description of dealing with HMRC in the final paragraph. My worry is the daily attrition of attempting to get HMRC to do what they are supposed to will end up in Tax Advisers/Accountants needing the defib'. I talk from experience...if this was the Daily Star the headline would be 'Harra is trying to kill me'. And when they put the phone down mid sentence the recording of the call is never available :o .

By FactChecker
11th Dec 2024 14:29
Really? You think that competent resources are currently being frittered away on answering the phone?

"a six-week study with agents found that one-third of contact attempts across HMRC phonelines and webchats were made to chase progress on existing queries, rather than make new enquiries"
... as usual there's no useful quantification in that 'headline news'.

- what does 'chase progress' mean (as in does it include calling a second time because the first person contacted either clearly didn't understand the question or even just put the phone down in mid sentence)?
- how will it benefit us to see that a reported issue is 'stuck' in the system (if you still have to make another call, or two, to get a defibrillator applied to it)?
- once it is (maybe) possible to see the status of your 'issue', it will be more visible than now when it has been incorrectly categorised/described/sent for review or whatever (which will *increase* the number of calls)!

Basically they still don't understand that putting 'everything' out there is a BAD idea unless you have first made sure that the data is GOOD ... and that will only happen if they massively improve the competence and training of those who are at the front-line of dealing with taxpayers and agents.
When (or maybe I should say if) that point is reached, then improved administration of the calls would start to bring benefits all round ... because the quality, and more importantly reputation, of call-handling would make everyone more relaxed about following the progress of a call.

At the moment, raising an issue with HMRC tends to feel akin to throwing a dart whilst blindfolded and after being spun around ... you can hear a dull thump (and the odd cry of pain) but have no idea whether it hit the board or flew out of the window!

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Fri Dec 13, 2024 10:34 pm

Harra said things are improving...really?

By vinylnobbynobbs
12th Dec 2024 14:29
I recently telephoned HMRC (yes I know) to see what was the position of a 2023 tax return sent in on paper late January 2024 as it could not be transmitted electronically because HMRC's system would have rejected it. No progress and the officer was unable to tell me when it would be processed.
So using an automated system set up by HMRC would no doubt be as useful as an ash tray on a motorcycle.

etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Mon Dec 16, 2024 1:19 pm

Harra said things are improving...really....just as treating patients in hospital corridors is unacceptable, so are 6-12 month plus waits for HMRC to answer blooming correspondence. Postpone MTD, reallocate staff and get a reasonable level of service before creating more chaos. Has James Murray approached tax advisers/accountants to receive feedback on MTD?

Below another accountingweb post detailing how poor things are currently.

After hearing nothing since January, my client has now had penalties of £100 for late filing, and a further £1,200 in daily penalties. I've sent in a paper appeal, with copies of FBI receipt and HMRC email, for which I have proof of delivery, but apparently their estimated date for dealing with this is 25 June 2025. The tax correctly paid in January has been set off by HMRC against the penalty.


etf
Posts:1434
Joined:Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: HMRC-is it time to call the Army in?

Postby etf » Mon Dec 16, 2024 9:52 pm

More happy punters......hopefully if I keep posting such examples James Murray MP will realise he is in charge of a basket case and will take appropriate action.

Posted 5 months ago by wlk385

Given I started this thread I wanted to update all that follow this thread and/or in similar circumstances: I still haven’t heard from HMRC (i.e. 7 months after submitting the return) and made an official complaint in June. I’m determined to keep escalating complaints, due to truly shocking disservice by HMRC. The final straw was my most recent attempt at obtaining any information from HMRC, ended up with online advisor telling me to “calm down”.


Hi Wlk385,

I am in the same situation where I have submitted an online submission before the deadline and they said they did not receive it and upon checking they said that they have received it as an amended tax return (dated Feb 2024). I have since followed up a couple more times where they mentioned they are still waiting. My concern is that I have been receiving messages from HMRC that I am late and penalties will be occurred which makes me worried. I have checked with the online team and they said they will be waived and the message will keep coming until that's being corrected. May I ask if you are experiencing the same issue?


Posted 5 months ago by halogenglow2

Same issue here. I submitted on time, and am owed around £1000 refund. I have spoken to HMRC on 3 occasions. First promised to escalate - didn't. Second time, I was told it had not been captured and was stuck, they would escalate - didn't. 3rd time I spoke to HMRC I was told the backlog is so large they cannot give a timeframe, and when I asked are we talking days.. months.. years? I was told no timeframe could be given. Even when I asked if it might be a decade - computer says no timeframe can be given.

I've raised a formal complaint for whatever good that will do, but i'd urge others to do the same.


Posted 5 months ago by wlk385

Hi halogenglow2

Thanks for raising a complaint and I would also urge others to do the same. I've raised one too, as per one of the previous posts. Obviously, no response within the reasonable timeframe I had requested, so I deem the outcome of the first review not to be satisfactory and yesterday I sent another letter to HMRC asking for a ''second review'' of their ''decision''. This is so that I can then further escalate to the Adjudicator's Office (which only reviews matters previously subject to a two-step review process by the HMRC).


Return to “HMRC Administration, Practices & Methods”