This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

NRCGT return

etf
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: NRCGT return

Postby etf » Fri Aug 30, 2019 4:07 pm

If my understanding is correct, another month has elapsed without an NRCGT tribunal case being published on the Gov' website. That is now 8 straight months without one (in contrast to a convoy of cases in prior years). Does this suggest HMRC have thrown in the towel?

If so:

-how can the Department still contend taxpayers have been treated even-handedly?

-when will the bods who ensure HMRC follow the content of the Taxpayers Charter invite Sir Jon into their office for an urgent meeting?

PS still awaiting any suggestions indicating why Goochie had his NRCGT penalties cancelled given the content of his accountant's appeal letter.

etf
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: NRCGT return

Postby etf » Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:24 am

Great train robbery proceeds: £2.6 million.

HMRC NRCGT late filing penalties charged £4.633 million (to 30 June 2019).

etf
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: NRCGT return

Postby etf » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:54 pm

I've copied below an extract from John Whiting's lecture on tax simplification:

John opened his lecture by explaining that tax simplification should make it easier for taxpayers to meet their obligations, lessen errors and increase the public’s confidence and trust in the tax system. Simplification has strong links to Adam Smith's four canons of taxation (certainty/convenience/efficiency/equity).

It can be argued that under the NRCGT system, all four canons (or cannons) have badly misfired:

Certaintly:just review the NRCGT tribunal rulings and you will see there is no certainty.
Convenience:having to make two separate tax filings to report the same disposal certainly is not convenient especially if you are based in a Borneo rainforest.
Efficiency: it can't be efficient for HMRC staff to turn up at tribunal after tribunal and be bashed by the tribunal judges.
Equity-tell individuals who have paid NRCGT penalties that the system is equitable and they will suggest you identify the magic ingredient in Goochie's accountant's letter that lead to his penalties being cancelled.

Over 10,000 hits have been recorded on this thread in the last fortnight, but zero feedback has been left. I'd like to think it is because a coherent case for HMRC bods to thoroughly review the department's behaviour is being made, but perhaps everyone is just staying well clear of the nutter who regularly posts on the NRCGT return thread. Either way, I'd actively encourage you to contribute to the debate, especially if you can solve the Goochie NRCGT mystery.

pawncob
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: NRCGT return

Postby pawncob » Mon Sep 30, 2019 5:28 pm

Your head and the brick wall must be well acquainted by now. We don't comment because we think you're doing such a good job of holding HMRC to account.
With a pinch of salt take what I say, but don't exceed your RDA

etf
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: NRCGT return

Postby etf » Tue Nov 05, 2019 11:43 am

Political party-we will build 200,000 new homes for first time buyers.

HMRC-we will treat all taxpayers even-handedly.

Common theme here?

Certainly, there have been no published NRCGT tribunal cases during the first 10 months of 2019 on the Gov' website.

etf
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: NRCGT return

Postby etf » Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:03 pm

I've just read the following (my bold) with interest:

BDO, the liquidators of the old company that controlled Ibrox, have continued to tussle with the tax authority about the total bill. That reached a maximum of £94m.

But it has emerged that HMRC has removed a penalty of £24m, after an appeal to the tax authority's Penalty Review Consistency Panel.

Surely this panel should be reviewing NRCGT penalties given the information that has come to light through freedom of information requests? If data such as that detailed below does not spark them into life what will?

So we have gone from a situation where 97% of NRCGT appeals failed to 97% succeeding in just a short period of time

Perhaps the mystery of the Goochie case (Lord Lucan equivalent in the world of tax) will finally be looked at. "And so HMRC, how many other cases are out there like Goochie?" "Sorry Guv' we don't know as we don't maintain records like that!"


Return to “Capital Gains Tax, CGT”

cron