This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

section 162 TCGA 1992

sunny
Posts:1
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:02 pm

Postby sunny » Thu Mar 13, 2003 12:49 pm

I am advised to incorporate my let property portfolio due to high profits being generated. Will I be at a high risk of CGT or can section 162 TCGA 1992 relief apply? I was told that the Inland Revenue do not recognise letting, although it is a business which involves considerable activity , as being anything more than an investment operation, therefore a serious risk of CGT liability upon incorporartion. Please advise.
forgot to mention that I am UK non domiciled if that makes a difference.

Nigel Lord
Posts:518
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:18 pm

Postby Nigel Lord » Fri Mar 14, 2003 1:25 am

sunny

The hold-over relief available under Section 162 is mandatory (unless the taxpayer elects to waive the relief). It applies where ALL of the assets of 'a business' (except cash) are transferred to a company.

It is generally understood that the meaning of 'a business' is wider than a trade. The Inland Revenue Manuals state:

"Section 162 (1) uses the word ‘business’ not ‘trade’. There is no definition of ‘business’ and so the word must have its normal meaning. It is a term which includes a ‘trade’ but also goes wider. We cannot argue that ‘business’ and ‘trade’ are synonymous.
Transfer: business to companies: meaning of ‘business’.

"It is a question of fact whether a particular activity does constitute a business. It is not easy to draw the line, but we would resist claims that the passive holding of investments or an investment property amounted to a business."

From the limited information you have supplied, it would appear that there is a possibility of Section 162 relief being available. You will appreciate that this is a complex technical area and professional advice should be sought before you proceed.

If you require any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact us, and we will be happy to act on your behalf.

Nigel Lord
Lord Associates
Taxation & Business Consultants
102 Smarts Lane
Loughton
Essex, IG10 4BS
020 8508 1642 & 07769 931852
lordassociates@ntlworld.com

Huw Williams
Posts:285
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:18 pm

Postby Huw Williams » Fri Mar 14, 2003 2:11 am

Even if section 162 relief is available, there is a significant problem with it that the business has to be transferred for shares, so that you would (I hope) end up with a substantial share capital.

Depending on what you want to do with the company in the future, this could cause a problem.

Depending on the size of your property portfolio, you may be able to incorporate in stages and avoid realising gains in excess of your exemptions and reliefs.

Huw Williams
enquiries@huwwilliams.co.uk

Huw Williams
Posts:285
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:18 pm

Postby Huw Williams » Fri Mar 14, 2003 2:11 am

PS contact me if you want more info

Huw Williams
enquiries@huwwillams.co.uk


Return to “Capital Gains Tax, CGT”