Postby Bill67 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:04 pm
I have a very similar query as this original post, only I already took my lump sum 401(k) a year ago. I had much the same motivation, namely to not ever have to deal with IRS again, given the amount was modest and not worth the admin hassle of spreading out over time (plan administrator insisted on withholding, despite my W8-BEN, so I’d have to file US return every time I withdrew in instalments).
I’m in the process of filling in my 24/25 UK tax return right now and have come across the same recent HMRC “guidance” dated March 2025. This maybe implies a change in HMRC’s long-held stance, but doesn’t actually say anything has changed, although that’s just my personal read of it. After all, the tax treaty remains the same, so I can’t see anything has changed legally. All HMRC has done is to explicitly re-state what has always been the case. The UK has always been able to tax residents on US lump sum pensions (even if it hasn’t done so in practice). The fact that the UK may tax its residents doesn’t mean that it will.
If I claim treaty exemption and say that no UK tax is due (which is what precedent says was the case at the time I exercised my payout), surely the worst that can happen is HMRC disagree and I end up having to pay a bit more in total tax than I would have previously. Besides, does hMRC have any other track record of retrospective taxation that breaks with a long-standing precedent? That would seem very un-British !