This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

Deed of variation - appropriate?

Simon L
Posts:2
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:05 pm

Postby Simon L » Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:28 am

A deceased's will (died 1 month ago) leaves a three way interest in a house valued at £850,000. The house is to be sold and the will provides that the £850,000 be split £275,000 to each of two children and £300,000 to the wife. Each child has received £50,000 in gifts in the last year.

Can we write a deed of variation that reduces each child's interest in the house to £75,000, and gifts the remainder of each entitlement to the widow, thus using fully the £250,000 zero rate allowance?

Could the widow then gift each child an amount, which would only be subject to IHT were the widow not to survive 7 years?

Nigel Lord
Posts:518
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:18 pm

Postby Nigel Lord » Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:59 am

Simon L

A deed of variation seems the logical way to resolve this problem. This needs to be made within 2 years of the date of death and all beneficiaries need to consent.

The nil rate band is £255,000 and a proportion of the gifts (£6,000?) in the previous tax year will be covered by the annual gift exemption plus the previous year's exemption brought forward if unused. This would allow the children to receive a further £80,500 each.

If the widow subsequently makes an "UNCONNECTED GIFT" this will fall out of her estate after 7 full years. It is important that no arrangement is in place giving rise to a series of transactions the only purpose of which is to give rise to a tax saving, otherwise the precedent set in Furniss v Dawson and Ramsey could bite.

As usual professional advice should be sought.

Nigel Lord
Lord Associates
Taxation & Business Consultants
Caxton House
Old Station Road
Loughton
Essex, IG10 4PE
020 8418 9101 & 07769 931852

Simon L
Posts:2
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:05 pm

Postby Simon L » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:47 am

Nigel

Many thanks - advice will be sought. I am assuming that an unconnected gift can only be such if there is no connecting documentation that links the relinquished monies with the subsequent gift.

We share a surname. Do you also have Lancastrian connections?

Simon Lord

Nigel Lord
Posts:518
Joined:Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:18 pm

Postby Nigel Lord » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:52 am

Simon

Certainly, it would be difficult for the Revenue to contend that an arrangement was in place without any documentary evidence.

No Lancastrian connections. I am an exiled Brummie. I understand that my great grandfather was from the other side of the Pennines and that there is a connection with Thomas Lord of MCC fame (also a Tyke).

Please feel free to seek bespoke advice. We are able to provide a drafting service as well as tax planning.

Nigel


Return to “Inheritance Tax, IHT, Trusts & Estates, Capital Taxes”