This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet

I H T

prudance
Posts:4
Joined:Sat Aug 10, 2013 3:52 pm
I H T

Postby prudance » Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:41 pm

I am the executor of the wills of both my father and mother. My father has only the minimum assets as several years ago he transferred his investments and the family home to my mother (his wife) His motivation for this was that he had a very substantial retirement pension and the transfer of his assets to my mother enabled her to bear the tax liability on the income from his assets. My mother thus holds assets in the region of around £700,000, including the family home.

Time has passed and both parents are now in their nineties and are increasingly aware of their mortality. They are concerned about a possible adverse IHT outcome relating the order of their demise. Should my father be the first to die there would be no probate requirement nor IHT implication, as his retirement pension will die with him and he has now little other assets.

if my father is the first to die, my mothers personal IHT allowance, plus the unused IHT allowance of her deceased spouse, would ensure that there would have no IHT liability on her estate. However should my mother be the first to die, she would only have the single IHT allowance of £325,000, as my father would still be alive and there would be a substantial IHT liability on my mother’s estate.

Is there any way, should my mother be the first to die, that the double IHT allowance could be claimed against her estate, notwithstanding the fact that her spouse would still be alive. They are considering the necessity of changing my Mothers will to leave her estate to my father, to cover the IHT issue. Presently both their wills leave everything to me as their only child.

someone
Posts:696
Joined:Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:09 am

Re: I H T

Postby someone » Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:13 am

Making the assumption that they are married - then your mother leaves everything to your father. No IHT and her nil rate band transfers to him.

someone
Posts:696
Joined:Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:09 am

Re: I H T

Postby someone » Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:16 am

Making the assumption that they are married - then your mother leaves everything to your father. No IHT and her nil rate band transfers to him.
Your father can then (assuming still of sound mind) change her (after death - I think you have two years) will so as to leave as much as possible to you while minimizing the tax on his death.

Given that it's at least possible that the inheritance tax laws will change in the next few years to help pay for brexit and covid, wills that leave everything to the spouse are likely to be the safest from changes to the law.


Return to “Inheritance Tax, IHT, Trusts & Estates, Capital Taxes”