Postby etf » Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:39 pm
I said 'Gov' websites not 'HMRC' websites.
The reference to HMRC is for their spectacular failure to roll out NRCGT with the diligence and thought allocated to other new tax regimes and issuing £1,600 penalties to unsuspecting taxpayers (if advice provided early on during this thread had been followed, the full penalties would presumably have remained in place-now reduced to £700).
Do you not think it strange that a tribunal case heard 6 1/2 months ago remains unpublished? I don't think it is unreasonable behaviour to keep highlighting this point until it does become available.
PS I'm still waiting for someone to identify what piece of information contained in Goochie's accountant's appeal letter allowed HMRC to cancel his penalties, but keep them in place for others with identical situations = not even-handed = not in accordance with the taxpayer's charter =Jon Thompson not fulfilling his duty to ensure the charter rules are followed (how he can come to such a decision without knowing why HMRC allowed NRCGT appeals is beyond me). So yes, I agree this is a rant, but until these questions get answered, I think showing Victor Meldrew qualities is wholly justified.