This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Farming: Tax Planning for the Negligible Value of Milk Quota
01/09/2012, by Julie Butler, FCA, Tax Articles - General
2203 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

It may be possible to utilise low-value milk quota to shelter other capital gains, suggests Julie Butler.

Introduction

It may be considered that the value of milk quota is currently ‘negligible’.  This can result in a very effective Capital Gains Tax (CGT) planning tool for the farming community.

It is certain that many farms will make a number of capital disposals which create a capital gain for which Entrepreneurs’ Relief does not apply. Examples of potential CGT sales are the sale of the residential cottages and pony paddocks (mere assets rather than a “business”).  The farmer/landowner is looking to minimise the CGT liability arising from these capital disposals and could look at offsetting the loss from purchased milk quota and negligible value claims.  A claim can only be on purchased quota.

As CGT capital losses cannot be carried back but can be carried forward the need to claim a negligible value loss on purchased milk quota in a timely manner is important.

Claim or Actual Sale?

There are two views regarding milk quota and the claim. The first one is that as the milk quota still has some value, the value of the remaining quota cannot be considered negligible.  The other view is that negligible value can be claimed.  Therefore, if the overriding approach is caution and absolute certainty, perhaps the way forward with the current values of milk quota is to activate a physical sale so that no claim for negligible value is required as there has been an actual disposal.

How to Make a Claim

Guidance is given in TCGA 1992 s 24(1A) which notes that a claim may be made where an asset ‘has become of negligible value’ while owned by the claimant.  The term ‘negligible value’ is not defined in TCGA 1992 s 24, or elsewhere in the Act, and therefore the words must take on their ordinary meaning.  In Helpsheet 286, HMRC note that ‘an asset is of negligible value if it is worth next to nothing’.  A holding of milk quota is considered by HMRC to be a fungible asset (CG77900 et seq) which must be taken into consideration when part of the quota is sold.

As there is no legislative definition for ‘negligible’, HMRC take it to mean ‘worth next to nothing’ (CG13124).  It may be advisable to conduct an online price check first to ascertain where the values of the milk quotas stand at, to show they are ‘worth next to nothing’.  However, such a claim is subject to HMRC approval.

Sale and Buy Back of the Quota

To realise a capital loss on milk quota, therefore, it would be necessary to sell quota on the open market and buy it back to be allowed to continue with milk production.  Where the holder of the milk quota is an individual or partnership, the identification rules follow those for shares and all disposals after 6 April 2008 will be treated as though made from a single pool.  The same-day rules, and the bed and breakfast rules, at TCGA 1992 s 105(1) and s 105(6) will apply (Capital Gains Manual, Appendix 10).  The “share-matching” rules are not applicable to milk quotas.

Summary

The action plan is that all purchased milk quota has to be reviewed in the context of tax planning.  For those who missed the action of buying and selling in the year to 5 April 2012 but need the capital loss in that year, the way forward may be to make that negligible value claim in that year and debate with HMRC whether the value was indeed ‘worth next to nothing’ (negligible). Such a route has obvious problems and the disclosure of the actual negligible value at the date of disposal is important.

Those farmers with purchased quota who need the negligible value claim in the year to 5 April 2013 to offset against other capital gains should consider exactly what is going to happen to the price of the quota in the year to 5 April 2013 and perhaps to show an abundance of caution to secure the capital loss by the sale and buy back of the quota.  All owners of purchased quota should review their position as a matter of ‘good tax housekeeping’. 

About The Author

Supplied by Julie Butler F.C.A.
Butler & Co
Bennett House, The Dean
Alresford, Hampshire
SO24 9BH

(T) 01962 735544
(W) www.butler-co.co.uk
(E) j.butler@butler-co.co.uk

Julie Butler F.C.A. is the author of Tax Planning for Farm and Land Diversification (Bloomsbury Professional), Equine Tax Planning (ISBN: 0406966540) and Stanley: Taxation of Farmers and Landowners (LexisNexis)

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added