This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Taking Penalties - is HMRC Winning the Fight against Inaccuracy?
14/08/2018, by Mike Down, Tax Articles - HMRC Administration, Practice & Methods
464 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

New figures obtained by RSM under the Freedom of Information Act reveal some interesting trends in the number and type of penalties imposed by HMRC against those understating income or gains.

Penalties are charged according to the type of taxpayer behaviour that leads to the inaccuracy. This ranges from a failure to take reasonable care (careless), rising upwards to a deliberate inaccuracy and finally the most serious, deliberate with concealment. The penalties can range from nil to 100 per cent of the tax underpaid, depending on the quality of the behaviour; whether the taxpayer voluntarily disclosed the error or whether he or she was prompted to do so by HMRC. Importantly, HMRC may agree to suspend penalties in relation to careless errors.

Comparing the total number of penalties imposed (154,714) for the most recent year, 2017/18, with the 172,869 imposed for 2015/16 reveals that there has been an 11 per cent decrease in inaccuracy penalties charged by HMRC. This may reflect better compliance, but we suspect it may also reflect a shortage of HMRC resources to check and detect errors.

Looking at a breakdown of the penalties, some 28,811, or 17 per cent of the total raised in 2015/16, were deemed to relate to deliberate actions, whilst in 2017/18 deliberate penalties of 36,975 - highlighting a 24 per cent increase. Of these the number of penalties determined to be in the worst category, deliberate with concealment, had nearly doubled from 3,466 to 6,160. Given the overall fall in the number of penalties charged we would like to think that this indicates that HMRC is improving identification of the worst offenders, as opposed to applying the rules more strictly than before.  

However, other statistics support the theory that HMRC may be taking a harsher approach. The percentage of careless errors (which fell in total from 142,775 in 2015/16 to 116,716 in 2017/18) where the penalty was suspended has fallen from 50 per cent to 45 per cent (from 71,801 to 53,040). Due to criticism levelled at HMRC by the First Tier Tribunal, we had anticipated that suspension might be offered more readily to careless errant taxpayers. Clearly this has not been the case, suggesting a stricter approach.

We are concerned that the pressure to increase value from tax compliance checks coupled with HMRC under resourcing may be leading to a more punitive approach in respect of the less serious taxpayer errors. It is especially disappointing that penalties for careless errors are more likely to be collected than suspended. This may be an issue for unrepresented taxpayers, who might not even be aware careless penalties can be challenged and suspended. 

Article by Mike Down and Sarah Saunders

About The Author

Mike heads RSM’s tax risk and investigation management team. He oversees all types of tax investigation, from suspected serious fraud to HMRC local compliance checks. Mike is a former tax inspector who joined the firm 30 years ago. He has built on experience gained within HMRC in dealing with a whole range of tax investigation issues. His experience ensures that he can readily empathise with clients subjected to a broad range of HMRC interventions.

Mike lectures on tax investigations extensively at both in-house and external events and is regularly quoted in the national press and in tax technical journals. 

RSM is a leading audit, tax and consulting firm to the middle market with nearly 3,500 partners and staff operating from 35 locations throughout the UK. For the year ending 31 March 2017, RSM generated revenues of £319m. RSM UK is a member firm of RSM International - the sixth largest network of audit, tax and consulting firms globally. The network spans over 120 countries, 813 offices and more than 43,000 people, with a fee income of more than $5bn.

(E) mike.down@rsmuk.com
(W) www.rsmuk.com

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added

Tony Talks - 

HMRC emails, MTD for VAT errors and VAT Software