This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
An IHT Saving – Pass It On!
28/11/2009, by Malcolm Finney, Tax Articles - Inheritance Tax, IHT, Trusts & Estates, Capital Taxes
3286 views
5
Rate:
Rating: 5/5 from 1 people

Malcolm Finney looks at Inheritance Tax planning involving the transferable Nil Rate Band between spouses and civil partners.

Introduction

Inheritance tax (IHT) at 40% on death is somewhat penal. Very few changes to the laws governing the levying of IHT are favourable to the taxpayer. However, one favourable change is the introduction of the so-called Transferable Nil Rate Band, or TNRB.

Every individual is entitled to a Nil Rate Band (NRB). On death the first £325,000 (if death in the tax year 2009/10) of the individual’s estate is subject to IHT at 0%. However, the TNRB rule permits a transfer of the whole (or part) of any unused NRB of the first spouse to die, to the surviving spouse.

Married Couples (and Civil Partners)

The transfer is possible where one or both spouses die on or after 9 October 2007. Thus, no transfer is possible where both spouse deaths occurred prior to 9 October 2007.

Example 1 – Saving £130,000

Pre-TNRB Era

Bob and Jackie Fraser are married with three children. Bob’s estate is worth £600,000. Jackie’s estate is worth £50,000. Bob and Jackie’s wills leave everything to each other, failing which their children.

Assuming Bob dies first in 2008/09 his £600,000 estate passes to Jackie under his will IHT-free due to the inter-spouse exemption.

On Jackie’s death in 2009/10 her now £650,000 estate passes to the children. Of this amount the first £325,000 is subject to IHT at 0% and the balance (i.e., £325,000) is liable at the 40% rate giving a liability of £130,000.

Post-TNRB Era

On Bob’s death, none of his NRB has been utilised, i.e., 100% of his NRB has not been utilised.

On Jackie’s death, the £650,000 estate passes to the children. However, at the date of Jackie’s death she is entitled to her own NRB (£325,000) plus that fraction of it which was not utilised by her husband on his death - i.e., 100%.

Jackie’s NRB is thus equal to:

£325,000 + 100% of £325,000 = £650,000
(In essence Jackie becomes entitled to twice her own NRB).

On leaving the £650,000 estate to her children under her will, no IHT is charged and a saving of £130,000 arises compared to the same circumstances in the pre-TNRB era.

Multiple Marriages

For those who marry more than once, and who survive their respective partners, there is a cap on the maximum amount of TNRB.

Irrespective of the number of marriages the surviving spouse is entitled to only one additional NRB.

Non-Spouses

The TNRB is available, however, only to married couples and registered civil partnerships; it is therefore inapplicable to co-habitees, divorcees and single individuals.

For such individuals the same IHT saving is possible but involves the first spouse to die leaving the equivalent of their NRB on discretionary trust for their surviving spouse and/or children. Slightly more complicated but still effective.

Don’t Forget to Claim!

On the surviving spouse’s death the TNRB must be claimed (Form IHT 402) and certain documentation needs to be provided concerning the first spouse if the claim is to succeed (e.g., will, death certificate, copies of Form IHT 205, IHT 400 etc.). It is therefore important that all documentation associated with the first spouse to die is retained.

The above article is taken from TaxInsider, TaxationWeb's own publication specifically for our Taxpayer visitors. TaxInsider is a monthly magazine containing numerous tax tips, articles, questions and answers from leading tax experts, aimed at helping taxpayers to save and reduce tax liabilities.    

To download a free copy of Tax Insider, and for details of special offers and how to order, visit: TaxInsider

About The Author

Malcolm Finney MSc (Bus Admin) MSc (Org Psych) BSc MCMI C Maths MIMA runs his own training firm, Pythagoras Training, which specialises in tax training for professional firms, banks and other financial intermediaries. He was formerly head of tax at the London law firm Nabarro Nathanson (now Nabarros) and head of international tax at the international accountancy firm, Grant Thornton. He is a prolific writer, and has been a visiting lecturer at the University of Greenwich Business School.

Malcolm Finney is author of "Personal Tax Planning: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition", now in its second edition and published by Bloomsbury Professional. Further information is available at TaxBookshop.com

(E): malcfinney@aol.com

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

sanjaykhocha 15/12/2009 10:11

5 years ago my mother gave me and my sister one house as a gift. Sine the house was transferred to us I had remortgaged the property to buy my sisters share. Now the property is fully in my name.<br /> <br /> Only recently my mother has found out that my sister no longer owns a share in the property, she was very concerned how this transaction took place as she was convinced that the solicitor dealing with the property transfer should have put a charge on the land for 90% of the property value, this was to ensure that me and my sister were not able to sell, remortgage without her knowledge.<br /> <br /> Recently we have received a copy of the file from our solicitor and indeed there was no mention of placing a charge on the land.<br /> <br /> My mother has asked for me to place the charge onto the land for 90% (even though I have brought my sisters share) as she initially wished. My mothers plan is to have the property left in my name (because I have paid my sister her share) and have a 90% charge on the land, in addition to this she want the charge to be transferred into my older sisters name when she dies.<br /> <br /> We have a mutual agreement that the property will remain mine (on land registry) however they want the land charge to remain to safe guard the property as I have had previous gambling habits.<br /> <br /> I would appreciate it if someone can answer the following:<br /> <br /> Does the charge count towards my mother’s estate (when she dies)<br /> If so will I or my sister have to pay tax on the 90% charge (inheritance tax)<br /> <br /> Thank you