This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.


Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
New Planning Rules - Do All Farm Buildings Need Business Property Relief?
27/05/2014, by Julie Butler, FCA, Tax Articles - Inheritance Tax, IHT, Trusts & Estates, Capital Taxes
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

Julie Butler comments on the effect of the new Town and Country Planning Rules on developing agricultural property.

Agriculture Property Relief (APR) for inheritance tax is restricted to Agricultural Value. Any element of market above APR needs to be protected by Business Property Relief (BPR). With the current changes to planning rules for agricultural buildings it can be argued that all agricultural buildings now have potential development value.
The changes arise from publication of the government’s long-awaited changes to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order, which allows the conversion of up to three dwellings with a maximum combined floor area of 450sq m. However, there are a number of qualifying criteria within the new order and one of the most important is that buildings for conversion to dwellings should have been in agricultural use on 20 March 2013. An essential criterion for farmers will be ensuring the Local Planning Authority (LPA) do not have an opportunity to say that the building is not in agricultural use. This may sound simple, but any buildings in equestrian use or let out for storage or other non-agricultural uses will not qualify for these relaxed planning rules. In addition, the rules do not apply to buildings in areas of outstanding natural beauty (AONB) nor in national parks.
Farming families who have no intention to develop buildings could possibly be caught for extra IHT on death as a result of these changes. There will of course be lifetime disposal considerations for the family. As most farming families trade as a partnership, the task of ascertaining how the property is owned will be a key step forward. For non-farming advisers this might sound obvious but often if Entrepreneurs’ Relief will be needed on disposals there must be planning to ensure all the criteria are met.
Planning potential is an area that advisers will not be able to ignore in 2014. The positives are that in reviewing this problem there could be solutions to other farming tax problems, e.g., ensuring there is an up-to-date Partnership Agreement.

About The Author

Supplied by Julie Butler F.C.A.
Butler & Co
Bennett House, The Dean
Alresford, Hampshire
SO24 9BH

(T) 01962 735544

Julie Butler F.C.A. is the author of Tax Planning for Farm and Land Diversification (Bloomsbury Professional), Equine Tax Planning (ISBN: 0406966540) and Stanley: Taxation of Farmers and Landowners (LexisNexis)

Back to Tax Articles

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added

Tony Margaritelli gives us an update direct from the HMRC, in an announcement that will affect many of those who are self employed.