This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
'Deemed Occupation'
14/08/2019, by Jennifer Adams, Tax Articles - Property Taxation
338 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

Principal Private Residence Relief (PPR) is one of the most valuable and claimed reliefs against a charge to Capital Gains Tax on the disposal of a dwelling house. To benefit from the relief, the dwelling house must be the taxpayer’s only or main residence throughout the period of ownership, excepting for any or all of the last 18 months of ownership (36 months should the owner or their spouse/civil partner live in residential care as a long-term resident, or is a disabled person, at the time of the disposal). Note that this term is to be reduced to nine months as from 6 April 2020 because a longer period of deemed occupation allows PPR relief to accrue on two properties simultaneously.

However, there may be times when the owner is prevented from living in his or her main residence for reasons that are not the owners by choice. In such instances, it would be unfair for relief not to be granted relief for that period of absence. A ‘deemed occupation’ claim is only possible where the taxpayer is absent from the property and importantly, has no other residence eligible for PPR.

Absences can be cumulative so long as one or more of these three conditions applies:

  1. any period of absence – maximum of three years, or
  2. overseas employment (not self-employment) of the owner or spouse/civil partner – unlimited period, or
  3. employment elsewhere (employed or self-employed) of the owner or spouse/civil partner – maximum of four years.

For a claim under any or all of the conditions the property must have been the main residence both before and after the period of absence in what is termed an actual occupation/deemed occupation/actual occupation 'sandwich'. Unfortunately it is often the case that for unavoidable reasons, the individual does not move back into the property. In such circumstances, even if the requirements of the above conditions have been met, the period of absence will not count and a possibly substantial proportion of the gain will be taxable. It is irrelevant as to whether the property remains empty or is let during the periods of absence.

A potential exception to the 'sandwich' rule arises where the property owner is unable to reoccupy the main residence as the terms of his/her employment requires him/her to work elsewhere. In this situation, the period of absence can still be treated as a period of deemed occupation.

About The Author

Jennifer Adams FCIS TEP ATT (Fellow) started business life in the Secretarial department of a FTSE 100 company before moving into tax as the UK Group Head of Tax of a Canadian life Assurance and pensions group. The group comprised 6 subsidiary companies and a unit trust company managing 9 unit trusts, with total premium income in excess of £700m and total staff of approx 600.

The 1990 Canadian recession resulted in the company being taken over and Jennifer moved into practice to gain experience at Senior Tax Manager level for Top 10 firms of accountants both in the UK and the Channel Islands. She now runs her own two office accounting practice and provides writing and proof reading services for specialist tax and business publication companies and virtual websites. Her work has been published by Bloomsbury Publishing, LexisNexis, Taxbriefs and Wolters Kluwer as well as Sage Publishing and the Chartered Insurance Institute. 

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added

Tony Talks - 

ICPA Chairman Tony Margaritelli asks What Tax Gap? and discusses the domestic reverse charge for VAT