This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
HMRC News Brief (01/07): Residence
04/01/2007, by Sarah Laing, Tax News - Business Tax
3277 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

HMRC have published the first issue of Brief, which has replaced Tax Bulletin. The topic covered in this first issue is residence in relation to the recent Special Commissioners case of Robert Gaines-Cooper v HMRC (SpC 568).

This case has attracted some attention from tax practitioners and their clients because there has been some suggestion that the decision has changed the basis on which HMRC calculate the “91-day test”’. The article now published in Brief 01/07 confirms that this is incorrect.

The “91-day test” is set out in HMRC booklet IR20: Residents and non-residents. HMRC believe that this guidance is clear that the “91-day test” applies only to individuals who have either left the UK and live elsewhere or who visit the UK on a regular basis. Where an individual has lived in the UK, the question of whether he has left the UK has to be decided first. Individuals who have left the UK will continue to be regarded as UK-resident if their visits to the UK average 91 days or more a tax year, taken over a maximum of up to 4 tax years.

HMRC’s normal practice, as set out in booklet IR20, is to disregard days of arrival and departure in calculating days under the “91-day test”.

In considering the issues of residence, ordinary residence and domicile in the Gaines-Cooper case, the Commissioners needed to build up a full picture of Mr Gaines-Cooper’s life. A very important element of the picture was the pattern of his presence in the UK compared to the pattern of his presence overseas. The Commissioners decided that, in looking at these patterns, it would be misleading to wholly disregard days of arrival and departure. They used Mr Gaines-Cooper’s patterns of presence in the UK as part of the evidence of his lifestyle and habits during the years in question. Based on this, and a wide range of other evidence, the Commissioners found that he had been continuously resident in the UK. From HMRC’s perspective, therefore, the “91-day test” was not relevant to the Gaines-Cooper case since Mr Gaines-Cooper did not leave the UK.

HMRC now confirm that there has been no change in practice in relation to residence and the “91-day test”. Accordingly, HMRC state in Brief (01/07) that they will continue to:
  • follow the published guidance on residence issues, and apply this guidance fairly and consistently;
  • treat an individual who has not left the UK as remaining resident here;
  • consider all the relevant evidence, including the pattern of presence in the UK and elsewhere, in deciding whether or not an individual has left the UK; and
  • apply the “91-day test” (where HMRC is satisfied that an individual has actually left the UK) as outlined in booklet IR20, normally disregarding days of arrival and departure in calculating days under this “test”.

Sarah Laing
Editor, TaxationWeb News

Links
HMRC Brief 01/07: Residence

About The Author

Sarah Laing
Editor, TaxationWeb News

Sarah is a Chartered Tax Adviser. She has been writing professionally since joining CCH Editions in 1998 as a Senior Technical Editor, contributing to a range of highly regarded publications including the British Tax Reporter, Taxes - The Weekly Tax News, the Red & Green legislation volumes, Hardman's, International Tax Agreements and many others. She became Publishing Manager for the tax and accounting portfolio in 2001 and later went on to help run CCH Seminars (including ABG Courses and Conferences).

Sarah originally worked for the Inland Revenue in Newbury and Swindon Tax Offices, before moving out into practice in 1991. She has worked for both small and Big 5 firms. She now works as a freelance author providing technical writing services for the tax and accountancy profession.

Back to Tax News
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added

Tony Talks - 

ICPA Chairman Tony Margaritelli on scammers, CAT, M&S and HMRC in his latest in practice blog