This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
HMRC "Big Business" Tax Deals Cleared by National Audit Office but Notes Lack of Tax Expertise
17/06/2012, by Lee Sharpe, Tax News - Business Tax
2488 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

The National Audit Office (NAO) has published the findings of its investigation into five 'large tax disputes'.  The report is broadly supportive of HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) in relation to the 'deals' although it did express reservations about some issues of conduct and found 'significant errors' in following procedures.

In terms of the quantum of settlements - whose precise details have not been revealed in the report or elsewhere so as to protect taxpayer confidentiality - the NAO found that the results achieved by HMRC were 'reasonable' - and at least one outcome was 'better than reasonable'. The NAO clearly appreciated that the complexity of some tax cases meant that it was impossible to predict with certainty that HMRC would be successful in court and that it was therefore broadly reasonable to settle on a sum by way of negotiation.

However, it also noted that procedures were not always correctly followed, and that there were some fairly basic omissions, such as failing to take notes of meetings or to consult as to whether or not interest was correctly chargeable. (OK, so maybe one of the taxpayers could be identified...)

Although Mr David Hartnett. Permanent Secretary for Tax, might well also feel vindicated on a personal level, for HMRC the outcome is perhaps a little more bittersweet; one entry in the full report at 2.36 is arguably particularly telling:

"...Sir Andrew Park noted that involving the Permanent Secretary for Tax in the high-level meeting was appropriate, given the magnitude and complexity of the issues involved. At the time, the other commissioners lacked detailed tax expertise, so there was no one else who could have represented the Department at this level..."

Taxpayers should feel reassured that steps have now been taken to more than double the number of individuals with appropriate levels of tax knowledge, with the appointment of two more Commissioners who have tax expertise. And there is also to be an independent Assurance Commissioner, who will review those tax cases with the largest amounts at stake.

Mr Hartnett is of course due to retire shortly.

The NAO's findings are published at Settling Large Tax Disputes

About The Author

Lee is TaxationWeb's Articles & News Editor and writes for TaxationWeb. He is a Chartered Tax Adviser with experience of advising individuals and owner-managed businesses over a broad spectrum of tax matters.
Back to Tax News
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added