This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
BrassTax: Zero-Rating for VAT – Read All About It (Digitally)
07/01/2020, by BKL, Tax News - VAT & Excise Duties
512 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

BKL reports on a recent VAT case with implications for digital content delivery.

In News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v HMRC [2019] UKUT 0404 (TCC) the question before the Upper Tribunal was essentially a simple one: is a “digital newspaper” (specifically, digital versions of The Times, The Sunday Times, The Sun and The Sun on Sunday) nonetheless a “newspaper” and thus zero-rated for VAT purposes? Or is that accolade restricted to the printed folding paper things of the kind that formerly emanated from Fleet Street?

Spoiler alert: News Corp won: digital newspapers can count as “newspapers”. But the case has an interest beyond the immediate decision.

In 1973, when the UK joined (what became) the EU, it was permitted (as a temporary and transitional measure) to apply zero-rating to certain goods and services that had up to that time been exempt from Purchase Tax (but not to further extend the scope of such zero-rating). In most cases, that temporary arrangement continues to endure to this day. That is the background to the zero-rating in VATA 1994 Schedule 8 Group 3 for (inter alia) “Newspapers, journals and periodicals”.

HMRC has historically held the line that Group 3 applies to physical goods: it has resisted the argument that it applies to “digital newspapers”. Such things, HMRC says, are not “newspapers” within the meaning of Group 3: they are services and are standard rated.

In News Corp UK & Ireland v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 129, the First-tier Tribunal (“FTT”) had agreed with HMRC. News Corp appealed to the Upper Tribunal (“UT”).

The FTT had accepted that, despite some minor differences in functionality, “the content of the digital and newsprint editions was indeed fundamentally the same or very similar”. But what was fatal to News Corp’s case was that (in the view of the FTT) the zero-rating in Group 3 applied only to goods. It was plain (and not in dispute) that the supply of an electronic version of a newspaper was treated for VAT purposes as the supply of a service. It was therefore not capable of falling within Group 3 and had to be standard-rated.

The UT disagreed. There was nothing in Group 3, properly interpreted, to indicate that it applied only to goods. What mattered was not whether a digital newspaper was a supply of goods or of a service, but whether it met the description of “newspaper”.

In making that judgment, one had to take into account the “always speaking” doctrine of statutory interpretation – that is, broadly, “whether the digital versions, with the characteristics found by the FTT, fulfil the legislative purpose of the statutory provision.” The UT noted (citing Hansard) that that purpose was “to promote literacy, the dissemination of knowledge and democratic accountability by having informed public debate” (marginally easier at first glance, perhaps, to see how this applies to The Times than to The Sun!) though it would also be necessary to show that the service under consideration shared the essential characteristics of a “newspaper” such as being edition based and containing curated news.
Despite HMRC’s imprecations to the contrary, the UT found no fault with the FTT’s finding that the digital editions “were essentially, when the evidence was viewed in the round, the same as or very similar to the newsprint editions”. This encompassed findings that:

• the digital versions were edition-based publications;
• they had similar characteristics to the print versions;
• the content was fundamentally the same or very similar;
• the updates to the digital versions were relatively minor; and
• the additional content which could not be provided in newsprint “was a relatively minor aspect of those digital editions.”

The UT therefore concluded that the digital editions not only fulfilled the legislative purpose of zero-rating but also had the essential characteristics of a “newspaper”. They were therefore “newspapers” within the meaning of Group 3 and were zero-rated.

Group 3, as we have hinted, is not restricted to newspapers. Other items in Group 3 include maps, charts, booklets, brochures, leaflets: and, pre-eminently, books. If, as the UT tells us, Group 3 zero-rating is not limited to physical printed matter, where does that leave e-books? One must assume that if an electronic service that meets the essential characteristics of a newspaper is a “newspaper”, it must follow that an electronic service that shares the essential characteristics of a book is a “book”. So, what are those characteristics? Which, if any e-books are zero-rated?

We predict that there are further chapters to come…

About The Author

BKL is a business name of Berg Kaprow Lewis LLP, Chartered Accountants and Tax Advisers, a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales.

The information in this article is intended for guidance only. It is based upon our understanding of current legislation and is correct at the time of publication. No liability is accepted by Berg Kaprow Lewis LLP for actions taken in reliance upon the information given and it is recommended that appropriate professional advice should be taken.

BKL
35 Ballards Lane
London
N3 1XW
(T) 020 8922 9222 
(W) www.bkl.co.uk

Back to Tax News
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added

Tony Margaritelli gives us an update following the recent government announcement about easing lockdown.