This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
New VAT penalties for wrongdoing
27/01/2010, by Sarah Laing, Tax News - VAT & Excise Duties
5601 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

From 1 April 2010, HMRC will apply new wrongdoing penalties relating to VAT and Excise Duty, where a person:

  • issues an invoice that includes VAT which the person is not entitled to charge;
  • handles goods on which Excise Duty has not been paid or deferred;
  • uses a product in a way that means more Excise Duty should have been paid; or
  • supplies a product at a lower rate of Excise Duty knowing that it will be used in a way that means a higher rate of Excise Duty should be paid.

"Handling goods" means acquiring the goods, carrying, removing, depositing or keeping them, or selling them. An example of this is buying cigarettes abroad and selling them in the UK. Cigarettes can only be
brought into the UK, without paying UK Excise Duty, if they are for your own use.

HMRC will not charge a penalty where a "reasonable excuse" exists. They state that such a reasonable excuse might be an unforeseeable and exceptional event that led to the wrongdoing. Examples include the death of a partner or close relative, or serious illness of the person, partner or close relative.

If the wrongdoing is deliberate, HMRC cannot consider a reasonable excuse.

The penalty will be a percentage of the potential lost revenue, such as the amount of VAT on an
unauthorised invoice. The percentage used will depend on whether the wrongdoing was:

  • deliberate and concealed;
  • deliberate but not concealed, or
  • not deliberate.

The penalty may then be reduced to take account of whether, and to what extent, the indivudual concerned tried to make HMRC aware of the wrongdoing. The reduction depends on whether the disclosure is unprompted or prompted, and the quality of the disclosure.

A disclosure is unprompted if HMRC are informed at a time when you have no reason to believe that they have discovered or are about to discover the wrongdoing.

 Reason for wrongdoing  Disclosure Minimum penaltyMaximum penalty 
 Reasonable excuse   No penalty No penalty
 Non-deliberate Unprompted 10 per cent 30 per cent
  Prompted 20 per cent  30 per cent
 Deliberate Unprompted 20 per cent 70 per cent
  Prompted 35 per cent 70 per cent
 Deliberate and concealed Unprompted 30 per cent 100 per cent
  Prompted 50 per cent 100 per cent

 It is possible to appeal to the tribunal against a penalty.

You can find more information on penalties for errors at www.hmrc.gov.uk/about/new-penalties 

 

About The Author

Sarah Laing
Editor, TaxationWeb News

Sarah is a Chartered Tax Adviser. She has been writing professionally since joining CCH Editions in 1998 as a Senior Technical Editor, contributing to a range of highly regarded publications including the British Tax Reporter, Taxes - The Weekly Tax News, the Red & Green legislation volumes, Hardman's, International Tax Agreements and many others. She became Publishing Manager for the tax and accounting portfolio in 2001 and later went on to help run CCH Seminars (including ABG Courses and Conferences).

Sarah originally worked for the Inland Revenue in Newbury and Swindon Tax Offices, before moving out into practice in 1991. She has worked for both small and Big 5 firms. She now works as a freelance author providing technical writing services for the tax and accountancy profession.

Back to Tax News
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added