This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Checking Employment Status
18/04/2010, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - Business Tax
3922 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP highlights some useful help in determining whether an individual is employed or self-employed.

Introduction

The issue of whether a worker is employed or self-employed is often unclear. This uncertainty has resulted in a number of Court cases over the years. From those cases various indicators have been established, pointing towards either a contract of service (employment) or a contract for services (self-employment). Treating a worker’s employment status correctly is important because if a business treats a worker as self-employed when he is really an employee, the tax risk falls on the business, not the worker.

The Employment Status Indicator Tool

Fortunately, it is possible to achieve certainty on the employment status of workers in many cases. HMRC’s website features an Employment Status Indicator (ESI) Tool, which enables the employment status of an individual or group of workers to be checked for Income Tax, National Insurance contributions (NICs) or VAT purposes.

The ESI tool provides an indication of a worker’s employment status based on responses given to a series of questions.

The ESI response can be relied upon as evidence of a worker’s status if:

  • The answers given accurately reflect the terms and conditions of the worker’s services; and
  • The ESI has been completed by the ‘engager’ or their authorised representative.

However, HMRC states that if the worker completes the ESI tool, the result given is only ‘indicative’.

The fact that HMRC will rely upon the ESI tool in the circumstances described above potentially gives taxpayers the best of both worlds. If the tool provides the ‘right’ answer for the worker, HMRC will be bound by the outcome if copies of the ‘Enquiry Details’ and ‘ESI Result’ Screens are printed or saved and retained in case the worker’s employment status is questioned by HMRC in the future.

On the other hand, the worker is not necessarily bound by the ESI tool’s decision if he or she does not like it. The tool provides information on how it arrived at its decision, which can be helpful. For example, in some cases it may be possible for the terms and conditions of the worker’s engagement to be changed to accord with their preferred employment status. However, it is clearly important that those terms and conditions reflect the true facts of the worker’s engagement.

Limitations of the Employment Status Indicator Tool

The ESI tool is not without its limitations. It cannot be used to check the employment status of some workers, including company directors and other office holders, agency workers, entertainers and those providing services through an intermediary (i.e., potential "IR35" situations). In addition, the ESI tool does not always give a definite answer. Nevertheless, it can be a useful form of protection in employment status disputes with HMRC.

Protecting Employment Status

What else can be done to protect businesses engaging workers who are potentially subject to an employment status dispute? Engaging the worker through a Personal Service Company (PSC) may provide protection in appropriate cases, as the tax risk moves from the engager to the PSC under the IR35 rules. There should be a written contract in place between the engaging business and the PSC. It is also important that the paperwork reflects the true facts of the working relationship between the parties, to reduce the risk of challenge from HMRC.

The above article is reproduced from Practice Update (March/April 2010), a tax Newsletter produced by Mark McLaughlin Associates Limited. To download current and past copies, visit: Practice Update.

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added