This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Tax Efficient UK Furnished Holiday Lets
02/07/2005, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - Business Tax
27426 views
5
Rate:
Rating: 5/5 from 3 people

TaxationWeb by Julie Butler, FCA

Julie Butler, FCA, of Butler & Co, points out some tax planning issues regarding furnished holiday lettingsBearing in mind the generally wet UK Summers, a review of the tax efficiency of UK property let to holiday makers might seem a joke article but think of all those campers looking for a warm bathroom and central heating...

Capturing the letting income as Schedule D

Income from furnished lets is taxable under schedule A, unless the landlord is in occupation and provides services beyond those usually provided by a landlord, in which case Schedule D, Case I may apply. Furnished holiday lets, however, can be treated as a trade, if certain conditions are met, to achieve beneficial loss relief, business asset taper relief (BATR), capital allowances, and other allowances that cannot be achieved under Schedule A. To benefit, the property must be available for commercial letting as holiday accommodation for at least 140 days a year and actually let for at least 70. It must not be in the same occupation for a continuous period of more than 31 days for at least seven months in any twelve-month period. If these conditions are met, the letting of furnished holiday lets (FHLs) is treated as a trade for tax purposes.

Wear and Tear v Capital Allowances

Wear and tear allowances cannot be claimed in respect of holiday lets where capital allowances are available. If a house is let long-term, however, expenditure on furniture and fixtures qualifies for wear and tear allowances. Wear and tear is calculated on 10% of the rents, less any expense that the landlord meets that would normally be paid by a tenant (such as council tax).

The wear and tear allowance is meant to cover furniture and fixtures that, in unfurnished lodgings, a tenant would provide (e.g. cookers, washing machines, etc.) It only applies to residential property that is furnished in such a way that the tenant does not have to provide any furnishings.

Instead of wear and tear, the cost of renewing furnishings can be claimed, as long as there is no deduction of the original expenditure, no claim is made for any cost of any improvement when the old asset is discarded. The landlord can also claim the cost of renewing fixtures that are not usually removed if a property is vacated or sold (e.g. baths, toilets, etc.)

Location, location, location

The holiday let does not have to be in a traditional holiday location, it can be in a city, near a racecourse or other sporting centre that meets the criteria.

The VAT trap

The standard rate of VAT applies to rents for holiday lets as long as they are advertised as such. If they are offered at lower rates in the off season, they can be treated as residential accommodation if they are let for that purpose for more than four weeks and the property is clearly situated in a resort where trade is clearly seasonal. Thus a VAT-registered sole trader owning a holiday cottage will have to charge output VAT on their VAT Return BUT will be able to claim input VAT on repairs and related costs. If high expenditure on the holiday let is planned, then the organisation of the ownership of the property to come within the scope of VAT can be considered as a tax planning exercise.

Two or three FHL properties would clearly cause turnover to rise above the VAT registration limit.

Protecting the income

During the winter months, it might be difficult to attract holidaymakers to traditional tourist locations and short-term lets for less than five months can be considered as income efficient without disturbing the FHL status. However, this could jeopardise the IHT position.

Protecting the assets from inheritance tax

It is important that clients who own holiday cottages should try and ensure, as far as possible, that they qualify for inheritance tax (IHT) relief. With property prices appearing to be permanently on the increase, the need to shelter these assets from inheritance tax is greater than ever and should be planned accordingly.

Case law suggests that in order to qualify for business property relief, it might be necessary to own a number of properties. However, it will also be necessary to be involved in running the properties. The Capital Taxes Office (CTO) Advanced Instruction Manual (before it was replaced) stated:

The Inland Revenue Solicitor has advised the office that in some instances the distinction between a business of furnished holiday lettings and, say, a business running a hotel or a motel may be so minimal that the Courts would not regard such a business as one 'wholly or mainly holding investments' for the purposes of s.105(3):

IHT relief is normally allowed on FHLs where the following is in place:

- FHLs - the lettings are short term (for example, weekly, fortnightly); and

- the owner - either himself or through an agent such as a relative or housekeeper ¡V was substantially involved with the holidaymaker(s) in terms of their activities on and from the premises, even if the letting were for part of the year only.¡¦

As usual, whether this IHT test will be satisfied will depend on the facts.

The Inland Revenue's solicitor has advised the CTO that many more such businesses would not be excluded by IHTA 1984 s.105(3) than the CTO had previously thought. The criteria is where the owner (either himself or though agents), 'was substantially involved with the holidaymaker(s) in terms of their activities on and from the premises'. The key issue in order for landlords to secure maximum tax reliefs is to be involved in the actual services provided.

Risk areas which might jeopardise the IHT claim are:

- where no services are provided to holidaymakers;

- where lettings are to friends and relatives; and

- longer-term lettings (including assured short-holds).

Maximising the income tax loss relief

Another advantage of FHLs is the ability to claim losses under TA 1988 ss.380 and 381, i.e. against total income in the year of the loss and the following year with all the advantages of opening year¡¦s losses. However, it is important to look at one tax-planning drawback.

Where a furnished holiday accommodation was first let as furnished accommodation only, there can be a restriction under s.381, i.e. the holiday accommodation is deemed for s.381 to start when furnished lettings began, not when lettings as holiday accommodation began.

The 'sideways' loss relief advantage of the FHL makes interesting income tax planning in years of high earnings for the taxpayer and possible high FHL overhead or management expenses.

Maximise the DEFRA grants

It is considered that the Government want to promote the UK tourist industry and this is not just through beneficial tax reliefs but through rural initiative grants promoted by DEFRA.

Contact point: www.defra.gov.uk

Many DEFRA grants require the claimant to be a farmer but generally not for bed and breakfast and FHL applications.

Local land agents can also be of a great help.

Maximise the FHL benefits:

- Schedule D, Case I status with the provision of services by the landlord.

- Ability to claim 'sideways' loss relief.

- Potential protection from IHT where substantial involvement with holidaymakers.

- Rollover of capital gains into the purchase, possible change of use and CGT crystalisation only on the disposal.

- VAT 'sting' for registered individuals but use to advantage when high expenditure?

- Become a 'grant grabber' and maximise grant applications.

Clearly strict conditions have to be complied with to achieve FHL status and all the potential CGT, IHT and loss claim benefit. Check all is carefully in place.

So much of tax planning is helping to make clients aware of beneficial tax reliefs but FHLs are a prime example of where the tax rules have to be met every year and must be 'policed' to ensure ongoing compliance.

Has your practice carried out a FHL compliance check? Have they been met each year?

August 2004

Julie Butler FCA

Butler & Co, Bowland House, West Street, Alresford, Hampshire, SO24 9AT. Tel: 01962 735544. Email; j.butler@butler-co.co.uk.

Julie Butler F.C.A. is the author of Tax Planning for Farm and Land Diversification and Equine Tax Planning.

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added