
Mark McLaughlin thinks that the government should not introduce new legislation without consulting first.
In the last few days or so, I've been having a close look at two new anti-avoidance provisions included in Finance Bill 2013. The first concerns Inheritance Tax and deductions for liabilities. The second deals with close companies and tax charges for loans, advances and other transfers of value to participators.
Both sets of anti-avoidance provisions were announced at Budget 2013. There was no warning or consultation by the Government or HMRC on either of them.
To some extent, I can understand why anti-avoidance measures such as these often tend to be unannounced. A period of warning or consultation could arguably provide an opportunity for those engaging in the type of avoidance being targeted by new legislation to consider ways around it. Having said that, in over 25 years in tax I can't remember a single instance of a close company participator deliberately engaging in the practice commonly known as 'bed and breakfasting', for example. This leads me to wonder whether some of the tax avoidance arrangements that the Governement and HMRC seek to block are more perceived than real.
In my view, proper consultation makes better legislation. If that means that some tax avoiders are likely to act on the 'tip-off' of impending legislation then so be it; or perhaps introduce the measures with effect from the date on which the consultation is announced. Either way, the Government and HMRC can benefit from the valuable and learned input of the professional bodies.
Best wishes,
Mark McLaughlin
Managing Editor
Please register or log in to add comments.
There are not comments added