
Mark McLaughlin asks why does the Budget need to be so long?
A couple of weeks ago, prior to the Budget, I predicted: "Unfortunately, all bets are off for another huge Finance Bill this year - no change there".
Sadly, my prediction was correct. Finance Bill 2012 is an eye-watering 686 pages in length. In addition, the explanatory notes to the Finance Bill add a "mere" 508 pages to the bedtime reading of tax advisers.
The Government and HMRC constantly talk about simplification and transparency, but then act in competely the opposite way. HMRC's apparent obsession with plugging perceived loopholes in the tax legislation certainly doesn't help. One well-known commentator recently complained that some of the press are too quick to criticise HMRC. Well, if that observation was aimed at me, I am happy to disappoint them. In my opinion, a Finance Bill approaching 700 pages is totally unacceptable.
In the long term, will the Office of Tax Simplification, or a general anti-avoidance rule, or initiatives such as the proposal to simplify income tax for small businesses, result in shorter Finance Bills and a reduction in the volume of existing legislation? One would like to think so. But then again, it would perhaps be unwise to bet on it if the Government and HMRC continue in the same vein.
Best wishes,
Mark McLaughlin
Managing Editor
For a comprehensive overview of the main developments in the 2012 Budget, see Taxbriefs Budget 2012 Report
Please register or log in to add comments.
There are not comments added