This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Overpayment Relief
21/11/2010, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - General
12858 views
5
Rate:
Rating: 5/5 from 1 people

Mark McLaughlin looks at the new tax 'Error or Mistake' Relief.

Introduction

Tax advisers will doubtless be familiar with ‘error or mistake’ claims. These claims broadly arise if a taxpayer has paid (or been assessed to) tax which they believe is not due.

Error or mistake claims were sometimes referred to as ‘section 33 claims’, because the statutory reference for the claim was in TMA 1970 s 33. The replacement rules are in TMA 1970 Sch 1AB ('Recovery of Overpaid Tax') and apply from 1 April 2010. Section 33 in its amended form simply cross-refers to this new legislation. The rules apply for Income Tax and capital gains purposes, where the tax paid was not due, or if HMRC has made an assessment or determination of tax which the taxpayer believes is excessive. The relief must be claimed within the statutory time limit of four years after the end of the relevant tax year (TMA 1970 Sch 1AB para 3(1)).

Relief Can be Denied

No overpayment relief will be given in certain circumstances. These are listed in the legislation as Cases A to H. For example, Case A provides (among other things) that no relief is given for mistakes in a claim, election or notice.

Case C denies overpayment relief if the taxpayer has missed the time limit for seeking relief, and knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the relief was available before the end of that time period. This "reasonable belief" requirement means that taxpayers will need to pass a subjective test, which may be difficult particularly if the taxpayer has a professional adviser.  

Case G also denies relief if the tax liability was calculated in accordance with the ‘practice generally prevailing at the time’. This is similar to a restriction in the previous legislation. It can sometimes be difficult to convince HMRC that this test is passed. At the other extreme, HMRC cannot argue that an incorrectly inserted figure on a tax return is in accordance with prevailing practice. 

HMRC Guidance

The HMRC guidance on overpayment relief is contained in the Self Assessment Claims Manual. It states that the relief not only applies for Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax purposes, but also to Corporation Tax and Class 4 NIC (SACM12005). The corresponding relief legislation for companies is in FA 1998 Sch 18 para 51(1).

Overpayment relief claims must be made in the correct form. If a relief claim arises from a mistake in a partnership tax return, all the relevant partners must agree to the claim, and one partner must be nominated to make it (SACM12045).    

Reasonable Belief

With regard to Case C and the "reasonable belief" test (see above), HMRC rather worryingly instructs its officers:

"You must judge on a case by case basis whether a person ought reasonably to have known that they had made a mistake and could obtain a repayment or correct an excessive assessment".

The guidance adds that HMRC officers,

"...should consider whether, taking into account their ability and circumstances, the person took reasonable care to ensure they paid the right amount of tax, and had reason to suppose that they might have overpaid."

HMRC officers are also reminded that taxpayers are not required to take advice on every aspect of their tax affairs, or to avoid every possible mistake, but that the person is expected to take note of any advice or guidance given by advisers or HMRC (SACM12085).

HMRC may Deny Relief if it Followed the Practice Generally Prevailing at the Time

The ‘practice generally prevailing’ exception from overpayment relief has the potential to cause difficulties, because it involves HMRC making a judgement call. However, HMRC’s guidance on the subject offers some encouragement to taxpayers and their advisers. It states the following (SACM12105):

“In relation to overpayment relief, the onus is on HMRC in any appeal hearing to demonstrate that there was a practice generally prevailing. You may need to refer, among other things, to our published guidance, advice from HMRC technical specialists, reported cases and external comment as evidence of a practice generally prevailing”.

The Self Assessment Claims Manual also includes some helpful guidance on the form and content of overpayment relief claims. [ See also HMRC's publication following the outcome of the Franked Investment Group litigation - HMRC cannot rely on the 'practice prevailing' exception where that practice was in breach of EU law - Overpayment Relief and Practice Generally Prevailing - Ed ] 

The above article is reproduced from Practice Update (September/October 2010), a tax Newsletter produced by Mark McLaughlin Associates Limited. To download current and past copies, visit: Practice Update.

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added