This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Pension Contributions
02/01/2010, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - General
4146 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP outlines potential difficulties with 'in-specie' pension contributions.

Introduction

It is not uncommon for assets to be transferred to pension schemes instead of cash. However, are assets an acceptable form of pension contribution to a registered scheme for tax relief purposes?

HM Revenue & Customs' Position on in specie Contributions

HMRC guidance categorically states in the context of employer contributions:

“In-specie contributions are not allowed. The legislation only permits monetary contributions” (RPSM05102035).

However, the same guidance then goes on to indicate when the contribution of an asset may be acceptable. It broadly states that there must be:

  • A ‘clear’ obligation on the employer to contribute a specified monetary sum (e.g., £10,000), creating a ‘recoverable debt obligation’.
  • A separate agreement between the scheme trustees and employer to pass the asset to the scheme for consideration.
  • Acceptance by the trustees that the cash debt may be offset against the consideration payable for the asset.

In terms of member contributions, HMRC states that contributions to a registered pension scheme must be a monetary amount (e.g., cash, cheque, direct debit, bank transfer) but then says; “…but what is allowed is for an individual to agree to pay a monetary contribution by way of a transfer of asset(s).”

Stamp Duty Land Tax & Stamp Duty

However, does an in-specie pension contribution as described by HMRC create a stamp duty or SDLT liability? For example, if the chargeable consideration for a land transaction consists of the satisfaction of a debt due to the purchaser, the debt amount is treated as chargeable consideration. A similar rule applies for stamp duty purposes (e.g., in relation to shares).

The position is not altogether clear, and the CIOT has requested clarification from HMRC on this point. However, based on HMRC’s view that a cash debt must be created for tax relief to be available for a pension contribution which is satisfied by the consideration payable for the asset, it seems likely that stamp duty land tax or stamp duty liabilities would arise.

Date of Payment

A further issue regarding pension contributions in specie is in establishing the date on which the contribution is ‘paid’ for tax purposes. HMRC’s view is understood to be that the time of payment is when the debt set-off actually takes place (i.e., when the pension scheme receives the asset value to set off against the pension contribution ‘debt’. For a land transfer, this would be the completion date, or for a share transfer this would presumably be when the stock transfer form was dealt with.

Further issues potentially arise. For example, even if the in-specie pension contribution is acceptable, there are limits to the amount of tax relief available. In the case of companies there is also the question of the timing and extent of tax relief from business profits.

The above article is reproduced from 'Practice Update' (November/December 2009), a Tax Newsletter produced by Mark McLaughlin Associates Ltd. To download current and past copies, visit: Practice Updates.

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added