This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Points of Practice
18/06/2005, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - General
3122 views
5
Rate:
Rating: 5/5 from 1 people

TaxationWeb by Burges Salmon LLP

Clarification on the tax treatment of certain payments to shareholders in a registered industrial and provident society, contributed by Burges Salmon LLP, SolicitorsThe tax treatment of certain payments to shareholders in a registered industrial and provident society has recently been clarified. This follows an exchange of correspondence between John Barnett of Burges Salmon LLP Solicitors and HM Revenue & Customs regarding the potential impact of the reworded legislation in the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005, which was introduced from 6 April 2005. This correspondence is reproduced below with the kind permission of Burges Salmon LLP and with the approval of HM Revenue & Customs.

E-mail from John Barnett CTA, Partner in Burges Salmon LLP, to HM Revenue & Customs

I hope that you are the correct person to write to concerning this issue.

If not, I hope that you will be able to pass the question on to someone who is able to deal with it.

I am just getting to grips with the rewritten legislation in ITTOIA 2005 and have noticed a small - but potentially crucial - change to the previous provisions of ICTA 1988.

This "change" (if indeed it is intended) is in section 397(1) ITTOIA – the previous provision being section 486(1) ICTA.

You will see from a comparison of these two sections that ICTA previously referred to share interest...payable by a registered industrial and provident society (IPS).

The new provisions now refer to a payment to a shareholder in such a society...

This may seem a small difference, but potentially it could be crucial.

Take, for instance, a payment made by one member of an IPS to another - perhaps on the purchase of membership rights by a new member from a retiring member.

Such a payment would not be within the ICTA wording because it is not a payment by the IPS. It could potentially be caught by the ITTOIA wording because it is a payment of an "other sum" to a shareholder.

I assume that this is not the intention. This certainly appears to be the case from Explanatory Notes Appendix Change 81 which picks up the old wording. Construing the legislation eiusdem generis would also suggest that "other sum" should be construed in the context of "dividend" and "bonus" both of which by implication suggest some form of payment by the IPS. Given that this change is not mentioned in the explanatory notes and that ITTOIA is merely intended to be consolidating legislation, I would assume that no change in the existing law is intended.

However, clarification on this point would be welcome. I am dealing with an IPS at the moment for whom the point may be relevant. With your permission I would also intend to offer the point to various technical journals so that the point can be made more widely available.

I will look forward to hearing from you.

Reply from HM Revenue & Customs

I am now able to reply to your query.

You believe that section 379 of ITTOIA 2005 may be interpreted so that any payment (other than a bonus or dividend) paid to a shareholder in an IPS and which is payable by reference to the amount of the shareholder's holding in the IPS's share capital is treated as interest for IT purposes. Thus a capital payment for a shareholder's shares by a third party is also so treated.

Unless a point is specifically covered by a Change Note or otherwise dealt with in the Explanatory Notes to ITTOIA 2005 it may be assumed that there is no intended change in meaning between the law as expressed in the old and new section.

We consider that the title of the new section, which refers to payments by IPSs, the context and general sense make it clear that only payments by an IPS (or agricultural co-operative) are included and this is how we will interpret this legislation.

Thank you for raising the matter. We have no objection to you mentioning that you have mentioned this point to us and that we have given this assurance.


June 2005

Reproduced by Burges Salmon LLP with the kind permission of HM Revenue & Customs.

Burges Salmon is one of the UK's leading commercial law firms. With some 550 partners and staff based in Bristol, and with a presence in London, the firm provides national and international organisations and individuals with a full service through the core practice areas of corporate, commercial, finance, litigation, property and tax.

Burges Salmon’s Tax Trusts department is one of the largest in the country. Its tax services are understood to be among the most comprehensive of any law firm in the UK.

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added