This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
More Gift Aid Problems
08/01/2011, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - Income Tax
3062 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP reports on two recent tribunal cases highlighting some restrictions on Gift Aid claims.

Introduction

Gift Aid is a generous relief, particularly in the present tax climate. Its attraction to individuals is that the Basic Rate limit (£37,400) and the Higher Rate limit (£150,000) can be increased by qualifying Gift Aid donations (ITA 2007 ss 10(6), 414(2)). HMRC is seemingly aware of the generosity of the relief, and has previously sought to block schemes considered to exploit the relief - see HMRC's Spotlight 9: Gift Aid With No Real Gift (29 March 2010).

In addition, recent case law suggests that HMRC are very keen to ensure that Gift Aid donations by individuals satisfy the statutory conditions for the relief (ITA 2007 Pt 8 Ch 2). Two recent tax cases underline this point.

What is a 'Gift'?

In Winston Osborne v R&C [2010] UKFTT 368 (TC) TC00650, the taxpayer appealed against a refusal by HMRC to accept Gift Aid claims in respect of an element of his subscriptions to a Masonic Lodge, which was paid through the Grand Lodge to the Masonic Grand Charity. The issue was whether the charitable element of the taxpayer's subscription to the lodge was a gift made by an individual to a charity, within the Gift Aid rules. The appellant argued that the Masonic Lodge subscription and the charitable donation were separate elements of a single payment.

However, the tribunal dismissed the taxpayer's appeal. It was noted that if the charitable element of the subscription had not been paid, the appellant's subscription to the Lodge would fall into arrears and his Lodge membership would be terminated. The entire subscription (including charitable element) was compulsory. Thus there was no gift element as far as the charitable element was concerned, as the term 'gift' indicated a voluntary donation. There was no 'qualifying donation' for Gift Aid purposes.      

Gift Aid and Benefits

There is a rule in the Gift Aid provisions to prevent donations qualifying for relief if the donor (or a connected person) receives a benefit in consequence of making the donation, if the benefit exceeds certain limits (ITA 2007 ss 416(7), 418). This rule can sometimes cause unexpected problems for the taxpayer.  
    
In Harris (as trustee of the Harris Family Charitable Trust) v R&C [2010] UKFTT 385 (TC) TC00667, the trustee of a charitable trust appealed against assessments to recover Income Tax repayments made in respect of Gift Aid donations. Mr. Harris and his sister, Mrs. Fine, had obtained Higher Rate Tax relief on the grossed-up value of the gifts. Those gifts arose out of a deed of variation, in respect of their late mother's will. The residue of the mother's estate was left equally to Mr. Harris and Mrs. Fine. The deed of variation provided for legacies to the charitable trust. HMRC accepted the claim for IHT exemption on the charitable legacies. The payments were originally treated as donations made by Mr. Harris and Mrs. Fine under Gift Aid. HMRC subsequently enquired into the charity's Income Tax repayment claim. 

The tribunal had to decide whether the Inheritance Tax (IHT) exemption resulting from the deed of variation was a ‘benefit' which prevented the gift from qualifying for Gift Aid. For IHT purposes, the result of the deed of variation was that the redirected gift to charity was exempt. This question arose in St Dunstan's v Major [1997] STC (SCD) 212, which involved the sole residuary legatee of an estate executing a deed of variation in favour of a charity within IHTA 1984 s 142. The Special Commissioner held that the redirected legacy to charity was not a qualifying donation for Income Tax purposes, and that benefits were not confined to gifts provided by the charity itself. A benefit had arisen from the IHT saving as a consequence of making the gift by means of a deed of variation.

The tribunal held that there was a benefit because an IHT liability had been removed by the deed of variation, that would have attached to property over which Mr. Harris and Mrs. Fine had a right of disposition. They each received the benefit of the IHT exemption in their capacity as residuary beneficiaries, in consequence of making the gift to the charity, which exceeded the Gift Aid limit for allowable benefits. The tribunal reached the same conclusion as in the Dunstan case. The appeal was dismissed.

An Alternative?

Interestingly, the tribunal touched upon a potential tax planning point in relation to charitable donations. Reference was made to the Income Tax relief for gifts of qualifying investments to charity (under what is now ITA 2007 ss 431-446). 'Qualifying investments' in this context includes listed securities and interests in UK land.

The tribunal noted that, unlike the position for cash donations under Gift Aid, the restrictions on relief for qualifying donations where benefits are received by the donor only operate as a reduction of the amount on which Income Tax relief can be obtained, and not as a blanket disqualification (ITA 2007 s 434). Qualifying donations of assets may therefore be a practical alternative if the donor is likely to receive significant benefits from the charity.

The above article is reproduced from Practice Update (November/December 2010), a tax Newsletter produced by Mark McLaughlin Associates Limited. To download current and past copies, visit: Practice Update.

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

Mark is now a consultant with The TACS Partnership,  an independent tax advisory firm that provides high quality, independent advice on all UK taxation matters.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional) 

Mark is also co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business‘ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is Editor and co-author of ‘HMRC Investigations Handbook‘ (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’, which provides free information and resources on UK taxes to taxpayers and professionals, and TaxationWeb’s sister site TaxBookShop.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added

Tony Talks - 

ICPA Chairman, Tony Margaritelli discusses Defining Moments that made him go WOW and he takes a look at GDPR which hasn't gone away in his latest in practice blog.