This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Editorial - Admit it: You "Simply" Don't Like Trusts!
17/06/2014, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - Inheritance Tax, IHT, Trusts & Estates, Capital Taxes
4120 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

TaxationWeb's Mark McLaughlin wishes HMRC would come clean over its suspicion of trusts.

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) published the consultation document Ineritance Tax: A Fairer Way of Calculating Trust Chargess   on 6 June 2014. This is their third consultation in this area.

The subject of the consultation is "Simplifying the calculation of Inheritance Tax (IHT) charges on trusts at ten yearly intervals or when assets are transferred out of the trust and making fairer the way the nil-rate band is allocated as part of those calculations." Unfortunately, this is not just about simplification. The proposals will restrict the 'nil rate band' available to many trusts when calculating IHT charges.

It is disappointing that the government insists on using 'simplification' as an excuse to change the law in this way, particularly since the proposals arguably do not represent simplification at all. It always makes me shudder when HMRC use the word 'fairness'. Fairness is in the eye of the beholder, and in my experience HMRC's perception of fairness very often differs from the perception of taxpayers and their advisers; and it often involves more tax as well. At least HMRC has dropped 'simplification' from the title of this consultation document.
 
The crux of the 'fairness' element of the proposals can perhaps be summed up by the following statement in the document: "...we believe that it is right that there should be one nil-rate band available for those individuals settling property into trust just as there is only one nil-rate band available to an individual transferring assets on death." Comparing individuals who are living and dead is an interesting analogy. A living person can broadly give away assets up to their nil rate band every seven years; so in effect, they get a 'new' nil rate band after seven years. A dead person cannot undertake a similar exercise, because they are dead. Is this a cogent argument for potentially restricting the nil rate band available to trusts?
 
Space does not permit me to elaborate on the difficulties and flaws in HMRC's proposals. However, it is apparent that HMRC is determined to push these changes through. A fourth consultation is unlikely, so it is important to consider the existing one and respond as appropriate, before the deadline of 29 August 2014. The consultation can be accessed at: Inheritance Tax: A Fairer Way of Calculating Trust Charges 
 
Best wishes,             

Mark McLaughlin

Managing Editor

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

Mark is now a consultant with The TACS Partnership,  an independent tax advisory firm that provides high quality, independent advice on all UK taxation matters.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional) 

Mark is also co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business‘ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is Editor and co-author of ‘HMRC Investigations Handbook‘ (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’, which provides free information and resources on UK taxes to taxpayers and professionals, and TaxationWeb’s sister site TaxBookShop.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added

Tony Talks - 

ICPA Chairman, Tony Margaritelli discusses Defining Moments that made him go WOW and he takes a look at GDPR which hasn't gone away in his latest in practice blog.