This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Court Of Appeal Rules That 3-Year Capping Of Input Tax Claims By HMRC Is Illegal
01/04/2006, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - VAT & Excise Duties
7250 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

VAT Voice by Andrew Needham

Andrew Needham, Director of VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd, highlights a significant case concerning the time limits for reclaiming VAT.The Court of Appeal has given its decision in an important case regarding the 3-year capping provisions on VAT reclaims. The appellant (Fleming) was a dealer in specialist cars. In 2000, Mr Fleming made a claim for repayment of the input tax paid on the three cars purchased in 1990. HMRC (C&E as was) refused the claim on the basis that the claim was made after 1 May 1997 and was therefore capped under Reg 29(1A) of the VAT Regulations 1995. Mr Fleming’s appeal had previously failed at the VAT Tribunal and High Court.

The Judgement

The Court of Appeal (CoA) found that the real issues of this case were whether EU VAT law would recognise and/or imply a national transitional period (i.e. one not specifically set out in legislation) and, if so, by reference to what event that period should be fixed. The CoA held that a transitional period could not be read into Reg 29(1A), which was incompatible with the principle of effectiveness, and fell foul of the ECJ decision in Marks & Spencer which stated at paragraph 38 that ‘transitional arrangements allowing an adequate period after the enactment of legislation for lodging claims for repayment’ were required. The regulation should therefore be disapplied. The judgment is extremely interesting, with a unanimous rejection of HMRC's case but for different reasons. Arden LJ tried to read a transitional period into Reg 29, suggesting it would start on 11 July 2002 (the date the ECJ decided Marks & Spencer) and end six months later, but this was a leap too far for the other two judges, Ward LJ and Hallett LJ, who simply concluded that as there was no transitional period in the Regulation, the Reg. 29(1A) cap was disapplied. Ward LJ also ruled that a transitional period could not be read into Reg 29(1A) on the basis that one cannot construe something out of nothing.

The future of capping

This is a major defeat for HMRC's capping provisions. It could be suggested that there is now no cap for late input tax claims at all until HMRC change the law to make it compliant with EU principles! However, this is likely to be an unsustainable argument, as the Marks & Spencer case confirmed that Member States have the power to introduce a cap, and may retrospectively shorten the time to make a claim provided that pre-existing rights are protected by an adequate transitional period. Curtailing future rights that only arise after the time limit comes in is not a problem.

This decision confirms that any input tax claim where the right to claim arose before 1 May 1997 should not be capped. If Arden LJ is right, this VAT should have been claimed by 11 January 2003 in order to benefit from this. However, if the majority decision is right, this VAT can be claimed now, irrespective of when the error was discovered. The same principles should also apply to output tax overpaid by repayment traders as such claims are also covered by the secondary capping legislation. On the basis of the majority reasoning, since no transitional provision was introduced for the s80 VATA 1994 primary cap either, it is now arguable that the s80(4) time limits are ineffective for claims for overpaid output tax by payment traders prior to 4 December 1996.

We must now await HMRC’s reaction to this defeat, and whether they will seek leave to appeal to the HoL. In the meantime, old repayment claims should now be revisited.

March 2006

Andrew Needham

Andrew Needham
Director, VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd
Email: andrewneedham@vatsolutions-uk.com


VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd
1 Dundonald Avenue
Stockton Heath
Warrington
WA4 6JT

(T) 01925 212244
(F) 01925 212255
(M) 07810 433927
(W) www.vatsolutions-uk.com

VAT Solutions (UK) Limited is an established independent firm of Chartered Tax Advisers, formed by Andrew Needham and Steve Allen. The company has a cross-section of clients from multi-national companies through to medium-sized and numerous smaller regional firms of accountants and solicitors. They produce a regular publication 'VAT Voice', which can be downloaded directly from the Internet via their website:

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added