This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
VAT OFFICER’S AGGRESSIVE APPROACH INCURS WRATH OF VAT TRIBUNAL
19/08/2006, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - VAT & Excise Duties
4167 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

VAT Voice by Andrew Needham

Andrew Needham, Director of VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd, reports on the recent VAT Tribunal case Anjun Suhail & REBA Textiles Ltd (VTD 19,448), in which the Chairman found in favour of the taxpayer and brought up a number of issues that are important to businesses.

Background

Mr Suhail was the MD of REBA Textiles, which was suffering cashflow problems. He fell into arrears with HMRC, and failed to send in some VAT returns on time. As a result, HMRC issued a central assessment for an amount that was less than the actual liability. The taxpayer paid the central assessment whilst negotiating finance to cover its true liability. To confuse matters further, the taxpayer had failed to claim bad debt relief to which it was entitled, and then HMRC came out for a visit.

During the visit, the VAT Officer decided that Mr Suhail had intentionally paid the central assessment knowing that his liability was higher. The VAT Officer noted that bad debt relief had not been claimed, but made no allowance for it, and issued an assessment for the difference between the recorded liability and the central assessment that had been paid. He also decided that Mr Suhail had been dishonest in his action of paying the lower assessment, and he was subsequently interviewed with a view to imposing a civil evasion penalty. When the refinancing came through, REBA immediately paid its outstanding VAT liability and, in error, actually overpaid by £6,000.

Confess, confess

Quoting the Tribunal Chairman on the conduct of the interview:

“The interview was aggressively conducted, in a hectoring, insistent manner. It proceeded at a fast speed. When Mr Suhail attempted to reply to the points made to him by the Customs officers, his answers were frequently cut off by one or other officer interrupting, so that Mr Suhail was not allowed to give a proper explanation of himself. In the latter part of the interview, both Customs officers joined in questioning Mr Suhail alternately. In our view, excessive persuasion was sought to be applied, and the atmosphere in which the interview was conducted was one of undue pressure exerted upon an unrepresented layman not versed in VAT matters.”

In finding for the taxpayer, the Tribunal Chairman commented that it was always Mr Suhail’s intention to pay his VAT liabilities and indeed he had overpaid when the funds were available. In addition, HMRC had failed to take account of the unclaimed bad debt relief, and the failure to pursue the matter with the taxpayer’s accountant when figures were supplied was strongly criticised, as this would have substantially reduced the overall VAT liability due.

Tips

There are a number of points to take from this case.

Firstly, if you pay a central assessment knowing that it is lower than your true VAT liability, it can leave you open to a penalty for dishonest conduct. In this case, the penalty was avoided because it was always the taxpayer’s intention to pay the correct liability once funds were available. They seemed to have treated the payment of the central assessment as a payment on account, coupled with the lack of certainty as the actual liability, due to a failure to claim bad debt relief.

Secondly, the failure to claim bad debt had appeared to increase the taxpayer’s VAT liability. You should always check what bad debt relief is available to you, and claim it promptly to minimise any VAT liability.

Finally, you should be aware that HMRC investigators can be aggressive, and can put undue pressure on a taxpayer during a formal interview. You should always ensure that you are properly represented at such a meeting by an experienced professional advisor, as otherwise, HMRC could end up overstepping the mark.

July 2006

Andrew Needham
Director, VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd
Email: andrewneedham@vatsolutions-uk.com


VAT Solutions (UK) Ltd
1 Dundonald Avenue
Stockton Heath
Warrington
WA4 6JT

(T) 01925 212244
(F) 01925 212255
(M) 07810 433927
(W) www.vatsolutions-uk.com

VAT Solutions (UK) Limited is an established independent firm of Chartered Tax Advisers, formed by Andrew Needham and Steve Allen. The company has a cross-section of clients from multi-national companies through to medium-sized and numerous smaller regional firms of accountants and solicitors. They produce a regular publication 'VAT Voice', which can be downloaded directly from the Internet via their website:

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added