This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our Cookie Policy.
Analytics

Tools which collect anonymous data to enable us to see how visitors use our site and how it performs. We use this to improve our products, services and user experience.

Essential

Tools that enable essential services and functionality, including identity verification, service continuity and site security.

Where Taxpayers and Advisers Meet
Is it the end for the ‘Belgian tax holiday’?
17/03/2005, by Mark McLaughlin CTA (Fellow) ATT TEP, Tax Articles - General
5305 views
0
Rate:
Rating: 0/5 from 0 people

TaxationWeb by John Kavanagh

John Kavanagh, Chartered Tax Adviser, offers his initial reaction to a capital gains tax anti-avoidance measure announced in Budget 2005.The 2005 Budget contains proposals to prevent the possibility of using a double tax treaty to avoid capital gains tax on disposals during a period of non-residence from the UK lasting less than 5 full tax years.

The government introduced rules in 1998 to discourage individuals who wished to avoid capital gains tax from taking the simple step of ceasing to be resident in the UK and disposing of their assets while they were not UK-resident ("the temporary non-residence rules"). Those rules took the form of visiting upon them a charge to UK CGT if they returned to the UK before 5 full tax years had elapsed since their departure.

It was possible, however, to avoid that tax charge where, at the time the disposal arose, the individual concerned was resident for tax treaty purposes in another jurisdiction and the treaty provided that tax was only to be charged on the relevant assets in the country of residence. Belgium was frequently (although not exclusively) used because of its helpful tax treaty, its relative proximity and the fact that it did not levy capital gains tax. In this way, the necessary absence from the UK could be substantially reduced.

Law change

The Revenue has previously accepted that the 1998 rules do not apply in these circumstances. However, they now say that:

• despite their earlier acceptance of the position, they now take the view that the rules were never precluded from applying;

• to put the matter beyond doubt, they are now going to change the law so that it is not possible to take advantage of treaty non-residence in this way.

The change in the law will also prevent an individual from side-stepping the temporary non-residence rules by contriving to be either resident or ordinarily resident in the UK while being treaty resident in another jurisdiction. Despite the fact that the Revenue says that it now considers that the temporary non-residence rules were not prevented from applying by the fact of treaty non-residence at the time of the relevant disposal, it does not have any plans to apply their change of view to past events.

Is it reasonable?

The Government's intention here, and elsewhere in the Budget, is to discourage taxpayers using double tax treaties to reduce their UK tax liabilities artificially. Is it reasonable in this instance? An individual may well move abroad in order to avoid a UK tax liability (and can still do so of course) but does the fact of doing so involve any artificiality? One can, perhaps, change the residence of a trust or a company in a manner which is arguably artificial but moving abroad, even for a year or so, is a reality which perhaps should be respected, even by our tax authorities.

All of the artificiality in this instance is in the new tax rules. The disposal will have taken place when the individual was resident outside the UK but it is solely the statutory fiction provided for in the temporary non-residence rules which treats it as arising on his return to the UK when he is once again resident. Shouldn't the treaty be applied at the time of the disposal, not at some later time which just happens to be convenient to the Revenue?

The interpretation of treaties is a matter of international law, which overrides domestic law, and it is not impossible that the new rules would be found wanting on that basis. But the fact of the matter is that the mere existence of these new rules may well reduce the number of tax tourists to Belgium to zero, with the consequence that there is every possibility that the legality of these amendments will never be challenged...

17 March 2005

John F Kavanagh CTA FRSA MIoD Cert PFS
Director, UK TAX CONSULTING LIMITED
Chartered Tax Advisers

UK Tax Consulting Limited was founded in 1999 by John Kavanagh who has 20 years of experience in nearly all aspects of taxation gained partly within the Inland Revenue but mostly in public practice. The company provides specialist tax consultancy and compliance services to private clients, businesses and to other professional firms, especially accountants and lawyers.

John qualified as a Chartered Tax Adviser in 1990. He worked for a “big 4” firm of accountants for 7 years, spent several years as a specialist tax partner with a top 30 firm and more recently was a board director of a specialist tax consultancy firm in the City.

John has written many articles on various aspects of UK and international tax, mainly for the professional press including the Journal of International Taxation and industry journals. John has also lectured and spoken frequently on taxation matters, mostly to business audiences.

About The Author

Mark McLaughlin is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Fellow of the Association of Taxation Technicians, and a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. From January 1998 until December 2018, Mark was a consultant in his own tax practice, Mark McLaughlin Associates, which provided tax consultancy and support services to professional firms throughout the UK.

He is a member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation’s Capital Gains Tax & Investment Income and Succession Taxes Sub-Committees.

Mark is editor and a co-author of HMRC Investigations Handbook (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Chief Contributor to McLaughlin’s Tax Case Review, a monthly journal published by Tax Insider.

Mark is the Editor of the Core Tax Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional), and is a co-author of the ‘Inheritance Tax’ Annuals (Bloomsbury Professional).

Mark is Editor and a co-author of ‘Tax Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional).

He is a co-author of ‘Ray & McLaughlin’s Practical IHT Planning’ (Bloomsbury Professional)

Mark is a Consultant Editor with Bloomsbury Professional, and co-author of ‘Incorporating and Disincorporating a Business’.

Mark has also written numerous articles for professional publications, including ‘Taxation’, ‘Tax Adviser’, ‘Tolley’s Practical Tax Newsletter’ and ‘Tax Journal’.

Mark is a Director of Tax Insider, and Editor of Tax Insider, Property Tax Insider and Business Tax Insider, which are monthly publications aimed at providing tax tips and tax saving ideas for taxpayers and professional advisers. He is also Editor of Tax Insider Professional, a monthly publication for professional practitioners.

Mark is also a tax lecturer, and has featured in online tax lectures for Tolley Seminars Online.

Mark co-founded TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) in 2002.

Back to Tax Articles
Comments

Please register or log in to add comments.

There are not comments added